WIMS> RE: [ping] Proposed format for PWG mapping strings in CIM MOFs

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Mon Feb 13 2006 - 15:17:04 EST

  • Next message: wamwagner@comcast.net: "WIMS> Protocol Document Posted- 15 Feb Concall at 1PM EST"

    Hi John,

    Second ping.

    Cheers,
    - Ira

    Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    phone: +1-906-494-2434
    email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: McDonald, Ira
    > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:58 PM
    > To: 'John Crandall'; McDonald, Ira
    > Cc: wims@pwg.org; wg-cimcore@dmtf.org
    > Subject: RE: [ping] Proposed format for PWG mapping strings
    > in CIM MOFs
    >
    >
    > Hi John,
    >
    > Any comments yet?
    >
    > Cheers,
    > - Ira
    >
    >
    > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    > Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    > PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    > phone: +1-906-494-2434
    > email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: John Crandall [mailto:jcrandal@Brocade.COM]
    > > Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 12:35 PM
    > > To: McDonald, Ira
    > > Cc: wims@pwg.org; wg-cimcore@dmtf.org
    > > Subject: RE: Proposed format for PWG mapping strings in CIM MOFs
    > >
    > >
    > > Sorry I did not see this. I will check the spec and get back
    > > by Monday.
    > >
    > > John
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
    > > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 12:31 PM
    > > To: John Crandall; McDonald, Ira
    > > Cc: 'wims@pwg.org'; 'wg-cimcore@dmtf.org'
    > > Subject: Proposed format for PWG mapping strings in CIM MOFs
    > >
    > > Hi John,
    > >
    > > Some background. The PWG is a member organization of
    > > the IEEE-ISTO. The PWG standards-track has only two
    > > levels, Candidate Standard and Standard. All current
    > > PWG standards-track documents are at the first level.
    > > Each PWG standards-track document is assigned a
    > > permanent document number when it reaches Candidate
    > > Standard level, of the form "PWG 51xy.z", e.g., PWG
    > > 5105.1 is the PWG Semantic Model. Note that _dot_
    > > infixed in the document number.
    > >
    > > I suggest the following ABNF for PWG mapping strings
    > > (using productions from RFC 4234 'ABNF'):
    > >
    > > pwg-ms = DQUOTE pwg-num "." "PWG" "|" pwg-text DQUOTE
    > > pwg-num = "PWG" "51" 2digit "-" 1*digit
    > > pwg-text = *(SP / VCHAR)
    > >
    > > For example, using this format:
    > >
    > > MappingStrings { "PWG5101-1.PWG|Section 4 Media Color Names" }
    > >
    > > The pesky infixed dot has been converted to a hyphen.
    > >
    > > Comments?
    > >
    > > Cheers,
    > > - Ira (editor of PWG CIM refresh white paper)
    > >
    > >
    > > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    > > Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    > > PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    > > phone: +1-906-494-2434
    > > email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com
    > >
    > >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 13 2006 - 15:17:17 EST