RE: WIMS> CIM> There is one possible candidate for EnabledLogicalElement

From: Richard_Landau@Dell.com
Date: Thu Apr 19 2007 - 14:50:45 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: WIMS> CIM> There is one podssible candidate for EnabledLogicalElement"

    Actually, I would propose calling the class ConsoleButtons or
    ConsoleInput. The existing function does not disable the lights or text
    display, only input from the buttons.
     
    rick

    ________________________________

    From: owner-wims@pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims@pwg.org] On Behalf Of
    Richard_Landau@Dell.com
    Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 13:42
    To: wims@pwg.org
    Subject: WIMS> CIM> There is one possible candidate for
    EnabledLogicalElement

    Console. Not ConsoleLights or ConsoleDisplayBuffer, but a class with no
    properties other than state so that it can be enabled and disabled. In
    the voting spreadsheet from eons ago, we all voted
    prtGeneralConsoleDisable as priority A. And there is a comment on it
    that says, "must be implemented as CIM state accessible by
    RequestStateChange() method." Who would have guessed that we had such
    foresight way back then.

    Proposal: When we get to it, we can use this as a pipe cleaner for CIM
    modeling of this writable property. I think it results in an otherwise
    empty class derived directly from EnabledLogicalElement. No new
    properties, just the state properties and RequestStateChange() method
    inherited from the parent.

    Comments?

    rick

    ----------------------
    Richard_Landau(at)dell(dot)com, Stds & System Mgt Architecture, CTO
    Office
    +1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3, MS RR5-09, Round Rock, TX 78682



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 19 2007 - 14:50:51 EDT