From: Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Date: Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:44:20 EDT
Craig - great job! Thanks for being our rep!
Harry Lewis
Program Manager - Intellectual Property & Standards
Phone: 303-924-5337
e-mail: harryl@us.ibm.com
infoprint.com
"Whittle, Craig" <cwhittle@sharplabs.com>
07/19/2007 03:16 PM
To
<Richard_Landau@Dell.com>
cc
<owner-wims@pwg.org>, <wims@pwg.org>, Harry Lewis/US/InfoPrint/IDE@IBMUS
Subject
RE: WIMS> CIM> DMTF Alliance Partner draft presentation
Rick, et al.:
The presentation went well. There were several members of “core” that
attended. John Crandall had the most comments. Overall the feedback was
positive although I still get the feeling that printing / imaging is still
the “red headed stepchildren” of DMTF. There only specific comment was
about the use of ComputerSystem as a future direction for our printing /
imaging classes. John Crandall said that services were better represented
under ComputerSystem rather than devices. He did not suggest and
alternative place for printing devices. He did suggest using association
classes to link devices and services.
Despite the seemingly endless rewrites of our CRs driven by last-minute
comments from core, I got the impression from other attendees representing
other alliances that our process is going relatively smoothly. I let John
Crandall know that.
The latest version of the presentation is posted on
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/presentations/07JUL-DMTF-Alliance-Partner-Technical-Symposium.ppt
Best regards,
**CW
From: Richard_Landau@Dell.com [mailto:Richard_Landau@Dell.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 1:18 PM
To: Whittle, Craig
Cc: owner-wims@pwg.org; wims@pwg.org; harryl@us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: WIMS> CIM> DMTF Alliance Partner draft presentation
Craig, how did it go? Hope it was okay. There was no phone bridge that I
could find to call into to serve as a backup, sorry.
rick
From: Whittle, Craig [mailto:cwhittle@sharplabs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:06
To: Landau, Richard
Cc: owner-wims@pwg.org; wims@pwg.org; harryl@us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: WIMS> CIM> DMTF Alliance Partner draft presentation
Rick:
Have you updated the wiki to reflect the latest changing the CRs? Is your
“work to be done” presentation also current? I can incorporate some of
these into the presentation this morning before I head off to Portland to
present this afternoon.
Best regards,
**CW
From: Richard_Landau@Dell.com [mailto:Richard_Landau@Dell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 7:30 AM
To: harryl@us.ibm.com; Whittle, Craig
Cc: owner-wims@pwg.org; wims@pwg.org
Subject: RE: WIMS> CIM> DMTF Alliance Partner draft presentation
Craig and Harry,
No problema. The Monday session was a big surprise to me, and I
mistakenly thought that 1:00 was the same as 1:00, but one of them was
Monday and one Wednesday. I apologize for the confusion, but I was
completely surprised by the mention of a Core-specific planning session
that I had never heard about before.
The Monday Core session was only about estimating the workload for next
year. I called in then and told Core about the remaining work in
- Printer device (a dozen-ish new classes plus corrections, approx fifteen
new CRs),
- plus the coming work for PrintService (approx 8-10 new CRs),
- PrintJob (no estimates), PrintQueue, and PrintSAP.
And I mentioned that there might be similar work for projectors (more than
six months from now) and a profile for network printers (also more than
six months from now).
I sent them a couple pictures from our Visios with small annotations,
which I also posted on our site as
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/cim/
Visio-Printer_11_WhatRemainsToBeDone_B.pdf
The session Wednesday seems to be a different topic, status and plan
update, and I think the slides you did are right on the money.
Please let us know how it comes out. Thanks. Again, sorry for the
confusion.
rick
From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 23:41
To: Whittle, Craig
Cc: owner-wims@pwg.org; Landau, Richard; wims@pwg.org
Subject: RE: WIMS> DMTF Alliance Partner draft presentation
Craig, appreciate you doing the best you can here. Seems like some
date/time info may have been miscommunicaed.
I'm sure I'd heard Wed 7/18.
In any case... I know Mark said webex dialup would be a viable option.
Harry Lewis
Program Manager - Intellectual Property & Standards
Phone: 303-924-5337
e-mail: harryl@us.ibm.com
infoprint.com
"Whittle, Craig" <cwhittle@sharplabs.com>
Sent by: owner-wims@pwg.org
07/13/2007 12:20 PM
To
<Richard_Landau@Dell.com>, <wims@pwg.org>
cc
Subject
RE: WIMS> DMTF Alliance Partner draft presentation
Rick:
The last e-mail I received from Mark Carlson was on 6/22. This is the
first I have heard of the Alliance F2F next week, Monday @ 1PM PT.
Unfortunately I have a conflict at that time. I hope the Core session is
OK with you calling in.
Thanks,
Craig Whittle
Project Manager / Scrum Master
Sharp Labs of America
(360) 817-8544
From: Richard_Landau@Dell.com [mailto:Richard_Landau@Dell.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 10:23 AM
To: Whittle, Craig; wims@pwg.org
Subject: RE: WIMS> DMTF Alliance Partner draft presentation
Craig, I just heard from Jon Crandall, co-chair of the CIM Core WG, that
they would like PWG representation at a meeting at the Alliance F2F next
week, Monday @ 1PM PT, specifically at a Core session for planning next
year. Are you planning to go to that session or some other one? They
would like to hear in particular how far we are down the path and how far
we still have to go. The question is how many CRs do we expect to put in
next year (I interpret that as the next 12 months starting now) so they
can plan for resources.
I will try to get complete info on the meeting name, location, time, and
so forth. Unfortunately, some of the schedule is published only to TC
members, of which I am not one. Did you get a schedule by email from Mark
Carlson? If I can get the phone information, I will call into the
meeting, too.
Here is some crude info in case you need some: we have about twelve
classes left to go to finish the printer device, after the four that
passed today. We are roughly half way through the technical stuff, but I
think we are 75% of the way through the controversies over class structure
and property structure. So it should take slightly less time to finish
the Printer device. How, how much time the PrintService and other classes
will take is hard to estimate. I haven't really looked at them. I expect
that there will be several classes added, primarily for capabilities and
settings.
rick
PS: Your email signature does not contain a phone number, so I couldn't
get hold of you that way.
From: owner-wims@pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Whittle,
Craig
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 17:11
To: wims@pwg.org
Subject: WIMS> DMTF Alliance Partner draft presentation
All:
A draft presentation for the DMTF Alliance Partner Technical Symposium in
Portland, OR on July 18th has been posted (see
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/presentations/07%20JUL%20DMTF%20Alliance%20Partner%20Technical%20Symposium.ppt
). We will review this as part of our face-to-face meeting. I look
forward to your comments.
Best regards,
**CW
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 19 2007 - 17:44:31 EDT