RE: WIMS> CIM> Hiccup on CIMCoreCR00946 (PrintSupply)

From: Richard_Landau@Dell.com
Date: Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:55:10 EDT

  • Next message: Richard_Landau@Dell.com: "WIMS> CIM> new version of CR for PrintSupply."

    Right, I had it wrong the first time. I think my final reply to Steve
    Hand was correct in identifying Type and SupplyUnit together as
    containing the data needed to interpret Level. See the later message.

    rick

    -----Original Message-----
    From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
    Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 12:11
    To: Landau, Richard; wims@pwg.org
    Cc: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
    Subject: RE: WIMS> CIM> Hiccup on CIMCoreCR00946 (PrintSupply)

    Hi,

    For the record, Rick's reply to Steve was inaccurate.

    CIM_PrintSupply.SupplyUnit defines only generic units (length, items,
    percent, etc.).

    CIM_PrintSupply.Type defines 'Staples', 'StitchingWire'
    and a dozen other types that we added for Finisher MIB in Printer MIB
    v2.

    Cheers,
    - Ira

    Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation
    Open Printing WG Blue Roof Music / High North Inc PO Box 221 Grand
    Marais, MI 49839
    phone: +1-906-494-2434
    email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-wims@pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims@pwg.org]On Behalf Of
    Richard_Landau@Dell.com
    Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:47 PM
    To: wims@pwg.org
    Cc: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
    Subject: WIMS> CIM> Hiccup on CIMCoreCR00946 (PrintSupply)

    The PrintSupply CR did not pass the TC, due to a strange comment that
    should have been made a month ago. Here's my response. I will update
    the CR and resubmit it.

    I wonder if the commenter actually read the CR in advance. I think
    that, in haste, he tripped over the name Level instead of
    RemainingCapacity (that would clearly relate to MaxCapacity). He
    doesn't have the diagram in the MIB intro to instruct him about the
    subtle difference. In my next life, I'm going to argue for simpler
    terminology that is less prone to this type of error but, yes, might be
    slightly less precise.

    rick

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Landau, Richard
    Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 14:24
    To: 'Betsy Richter'
    Cc: steve_hand@symantec.com; 'John Crandall'; Hass, Jon
    Subject: RE: Groups - CIMCoreCR00946.007.htm modified

    Betsy (and Steve),

    Thanks for the note about CIMCoreCR00946.

    1. The change to the CR after the Core ballot was extremely minor. I
    changed the Model field in the header from Core to Device, at John
    Crandall's request. There is no substantive change for Steve to review.

    2. To respond to Steve's question directly, the property
    CIM_PrintSupply.Level is designed to answer the question, How much of
    the supply remains, regardless of the type of supply. The combination
    of SupplyUnit, MaxCapacity, and Level (and their related OtherXxx and
    XxxBasis properties) should supply the information needed by an
    application.

    Perhaps the confusion stems from the fact that the SupplyUnit property
    does not contain an enum value for "NumberOfStaples." Staples are not
    usually loaded into a "stapler" finisher as preformed staples, but
    instead as a continuous spool of wire which is sewn into the paper.
    (Stapler finishers are often called "stitchers" for this reason.)
    Depending on the manufacturer's preference, the SupplyUnit for a
    stitcher/stapler might be Feet, Meters, Percent, etc.

    Note that not every Finisher consumes a Supply. Sorters, folders,
    bursters, and so forth, do not.

    I hope this clears up the confusion. What do I need to do now about the
    CR? Shall I revise it to include this comment and response, and set its
    state back to CMTE-Pending?

    Tnx.

    rick
    ----------------------
    Richard_Landau(at)dell(dot)com, Stds & System Mgt Architecture, CTO
    Office
    +1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3, MS RR5-09, Round Rock, TX 78682

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Betsy Richter [mailto:brichter@kavi.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 16:47
    Cc: steve_hand@symantec.com; brichter@kavi.com
    Subject: Groups - CIMCoreCR00946.007.htm modified

    This CR did NOT pass the TC and wasn't resolved on yesterday's call
    (Steve Hand wasn't present to review the updated CR).

    Ballot comments as follows:

    Steve Hand Symantec Corporation It is not clear to me how this
    class
    represents the supplies for the print finisher. For example, ought there
    be a property that contains the remaining staples?

    I note that there's an updated CR uploaded post-ballot. Rick, do you
    want Steve to review this CR and approve via email? If so, make sure
    I'm copied on the approval, please.

     -- Betsy Richter

    Information about the document named CIMCoreCR00946.007.htm has been
    modified by Betsy Richter.

    Document Description:
    [2.17 Experimental] Add class CIM_PrintSupply.

    View Document Details:
    http://www.dmtf.org/apps/org/workgroup/cim-core/document.php?document_id
    =32410

    Download Latest Revision of Document:
    http://www.dmtf.org/apps/org/workgroup/cim-core/download.php/32410/lates
    t/CIMCoreCR00946.007.htm

    Referenced Items
    Date Name Type
    ---- ---- ----
    2007-08-21 CIMCoreCR00946:Add class CIM_PrintSupplyBallot

    PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email
    application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able
    to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your
    web browser.

    -DMTF Administration

    No virus found in this outgoing message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.6/971 - Release Date:
    8/24/2007 2:59 PM
     



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Aug 24 2007 - 13:56:28 EDT