Resend of the following message.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 17:59:40 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
From: Ron Bergman <rbergma at dpc.com>
To: Kevin Palmer <kpalmer at duplousa.com>
Cc: fin at pwg.org
Subject: RE: FIN> Alignment of Xerox IPP Attributes with FIN MIB
Kevin,
After considerable thought on this subject I have concluded that the best
solution for this request is the addition of a new attribute and textual
convention. In this manner the orientation of the staple fold can be
defined for any staple operation.
I am also sending this to the FIN mailing list (not only to see if it is
again working but ;-) to get everyone's view.
New textual convention:
----------------------
StitchingDirTypeTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
-- This is a type 1 enumeration.
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Defines the direction, relative to the top sheet in the output
subunit, that the stitching operation was performed. For a
topDown(3) process, the staple will be clinched on the bottom
of the stack. This parameter can be used to determine what
order the pages of a booklet are to be printed such that the
staple clinch will be on the inside of the resulting booklet."
SYNTAX INTEGER {
unknown(2),
topDown(3),
bottomUp(5)
}
New Attribute to define "Stitching Direction":
---------------------------------------------
stitchingDirection(30), StitchingDirTypeTC
INTEGER: Defines the orientation of the stitching
process.
Please comment by Friday, Sept 18. I would like to get an updated draft
out prior to the Savannah meeting.
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.
> >
> > Kevin,
> >
> > I have no objection to this addition, but could you explain? I understand
> > saddle stitch. What is saddle stitch bottom?
> >
> >
> > Ron Bergman
> > Dataproducts Corp.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Kevin Palmer wrote:
> >
> > > If we are to change, should we not include:
> > > saddleStitchBottom(14)
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > From: Ron Bergman
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 1998 6:32 PM
> > > To: fin at pwg.org> > > Subject: FIN> Alignment of Xerox IPP Attributes with FIN MIB
> > >
> > > Xerox is requesting the registration of several new IPP
> > > attributes that fall within the scope of the Finisher MIB.
> > > Four of these new attributes are not currently supported in
> > > the Finisher MIB. They are:
> > >
> > > staple-dual-top
> > > staple-dual-bottom
> > > staple-dual-left
> > > staple-dual-right
> > >
> > > Also, the Finisher MIB "FinStitchingTypeTC" contains the
> > > enum "stitch(10)" which is not included in the Xerox set.
> > > This appears to be a generic enum which was to have been
> > > replaced by "other(1)". I propose that "stitch(10)" be
> > > removed.
> > >
> > > The revised "FinStitchingTypeTC" enum set would be:
> > >
> > >
> > > other(1),
> > > unknown(2),
> > > stapleTopLeft(4),
> > > stapleBottomLeft(5),
> > > stapleTopRight(6),
> > > stapleBottomRight(7),
> > > saddleStitch(8),
> > > edgeStitch(9),
> > > stapleDualTop(10),
> > > stapleDualBottom(11),
> > > stapleDualLeft(12),
> > > stapleDualRight(13)
> > >
> > > Comments?
> > >
> > >
> > > Ron Bergman
> > > Dataproducts Corp.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>>>