Tom,
Your proposed changes look very good!
I did notice that there are four other TCs that reflect the same situation
as with JmAttributeTypeTC. They are:
JmFinishingTypeTC
JmMediumTypeTC
JmJobSubmissionTypeTC
JmJobStateTC
In the case of the first two, the definitions could be added as comments
with the enums. For the second two, the specs should also be moved out of
the MIB and into the text
I will submit a proposal for these changes unless the other JMP
participants feel strongly that a change here is not required.
Also the bit-mapped TCs are structured very different than what is in the
current Printer MIB and the HR MIB. I suggest everyone look at this and
indicate if we should revise.
JmJobServiceTypesTC
JmJobStateReasonsTC
JmJobStateReasons2TC
JmJobStateReasons3TC
JmJobStateReasons4TC
I see that you also changed this to v1.2 ( was v1 ). The editorial
changes should not affect the revision status, nor should the addition of
the 2 new enums. So I prefer that the MIB remain at v1.
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.