JMP> Job Monitoring MIB, Request for Publication as an RFC

JMP> Job Monitoring MIB, Request for Publication as an RFC

Ron Bergman rbergma at dpc.com
Wed Mar 24 11:07:32 EST 1999


Bert and David,

The Printer Working Group has revised the Job Monitoring MIB draft, 
incorporating many of the changes that you have recommended.  We believe 
that the documents are now ready to be published as RFCs.  The latest 
drafts are available in the IETF Internet-Drafts directory as:

   draft-ietf-printmib-job-monitor-08.txt   (Feb 19, 1999)
   draft-ietf-printmib-job-protomap-04.txt  (Sept 21, 1998)

During our previous communications, you had suggested that the MIB 
document be published as an Experimental RFC.  The PWG does not object 
to either an Informational or an Experimental status.  The companion 
Mapping Recommendations document should be an Informational RFC 
regardless. 

We are requesting that you review the updated document and provide a 
recommendation for publication.  Following your review, the PWG will 
submit the documents to the appropriate IETF representative for 
publication.

A summary of the document changes:

1. All REFERENCES clauses have been removed since they referred to 
   sections in the specification that are not within the actual MIB.  
   This change was recommended by Bert Wijnen and Keith McCloghrie.

2. Moved the definitions of the enumerations from the Textual Convention 
   entries in the MIB to the sections preceding the MIB.  This change 
   was applied to JmAttributeTypeTC, JmJobSubmissionIDTypeTC, 
   JmJobStateReasons1TC, JmJobStateReasons2TC, JmJobStateReasons3TC, and 
   JmJobStateReasons4TC.  This change was recommended by Keith 
   McCloghrie.

3. Added the related data types as ASN.1 comments for each enumeration 
   in JmAttributeTypeTC.

4. Replaced the use of "SHALL" with "is" for those cases where the 
   statement is not a conformance requirement.  This change was 
   recommended by Bert Wijnen.

5. Clarified sections 3.3.3 and 3.3.7 to explain that the DEFVAL of 0 
   for index attributes is different from the DEFVAL of -2 for 
   JmAttributeValueAsInteger.

6. Clarified the relationships of the values of JmJobCollationTypeTC 
   with the IPP "multiple-document-handling" attribute.

7. Clarified that the values of the mediumRequested(170) and 
   mediumConsumed(171) attributes may be any of the IPP media values of 
   media name, media size names, and input tray names.

8. Added two new attributes, mediumTypeConsumed(174) and 
   mediumSizeConsumed(175) to JmAttributeTypeTC.

9. Changed "insure" to "ensure".

10. Fixed an incorrect reference in the jmAttributeEntry DESCRIPTION 
    clause from jmJobTable to jmAttributeTable.


The PWG would like to thank you for your time and patience in this matter.


	For the PWG,

	Ron Bergman
	Dataproducts Corp.
	rbergma at dpc.com
	voice: 805 578 4421
	fax:   805 578 4005





More information about the Jmp mailing list