From imcdonald at sharplabs.com Tue Aug 6 15:44:16 2002 From: imcdonald at sharplabs.com (McDonald, Ira) Date: Wed May 6 14:00:01 2009 Subject: JMP> SNMPv1 moving to Historic status Message-ID: <116DB56CD7DED511BC7800508B2CA53735CD31@mailsrvnt02.enet.sharplabs.com> Hi Folks, Note the following abstract in in the change bar version of the latest draft of RFC 2570 updates, soon to be available at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-snmpv3-rfc2570bis-03.txt Abstract The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the third version of the Internet-Standard Management Framework, termed the SNMP version 3 Framework (SNMPv3). This Framework is derived from and builds upon both the original Internet- Standard Management Framework (SNMPv1) and the second Internet-Standard Management Framework (SNMPv2). The architecture is designed to be modular to allow the evolution of the Framework over time. | The document explains why using SNMPv3 instead of SNMPv1 or | SNMPv2 is strongly recommended. The document also recommends | that RFCs 1157, 1441, 1901, 1909 and 1910 be retired by moving | them to Historic status. | This document obsoletes RFC 2570. | This document is a work product of the SNMPv3 Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). From imcdonald at sharplabs.com Fri Aug 16 18:00:42 2002 From: imcdonald at sharplabs.com (McDonald, Ira) Date: Wed May 6 14:00:01 2009 Subject: JMP> Will Printers Implement SNMPv3? Message-ID: <116DB56CD7DED511BC7800508B2CA53735CD4B@mailsrvnt02.enet.sharplabs.com> Hi folks, FYI - buried below is the IESG agreeing that SNMPv1 and SNMPv2 will reclassified as Historic (that is, REMOVED from the 'standards-track') as part of the advancement of SNMPv3 to (full) Standard status. Cheers, - Ira McDonald PS - Ron Bergman agrees with me that there is probably no printer in the universe that CURRENTLY implements SNMPv3. Anyone planning to do so? This de-certification of SNMPv1 strikes me as a problem for vendors of non-network-infrastructure network-connected boxes. -----Original Message----- From: The IESG [mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: IETF-Announce; @tislabs.com Cc: RFC Editor; Internet Architecture Board; snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com Subject: Document Action: Introduction to Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework to Informational The IESG has approved the internet draft Introduction to Version 3 of the Internet-Standard Management Framework as an Informational RFC. The IESG also agrees with the recommendation to reclassify RFCs 1157, 1441, 1901, 1909 and 1910 as Historic and has approved this reclassification. This document is the product of the SNMPv3 Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Randy Bush and Bert Wijnen. Technical Summary This document is an introduction to the third version of the Internet-Standard Management Framework, termed the SNMP version 3 Management Framework (SNMPv3). It describes the relationship between the SNMP version 3 (SNMPv3) specifications and the specifications of the SNMP version 1 (SNMPv1) Management Framework, the SNMP version 2 (SNMPv2) Management Framework, and the Community-based Administrative Framework for SNMPv2. It also provides a roadmap to the multiple documents which contain the relevant specifications. The document further recommends reclassification of RFCs 1157, 1441, 1901, 1909 and 1910 as Historic and explains why. Working Group Summary The Working Group reached consensus on this document and its recommendation. Protocol Quality Bert Wijnen and Randy Bush reviewed the specification for the IESG. Note to RFC Editor: Please add the following to the end of section 7.8: Work is underway to specify how AES is to be used within the User-based Security Model (USM). This will be a separate document. From imcdonald at sharplabs.com Tue Aug 6 15:44:16 2002 From: imcdonald at sharplabs.com (McDonald, Ira) Date: Wed May 6 14:00:18 2009 Subject: JMP> SNMPv1 moving to Historic status Message-ID: <116DB56CD7DED511BC7800508B2CA53735CD31@mailsrvnt02.enet.sharplabs.com> Hi Folks, Note the following abstract in in the change bar version of the latest draft of RFC 2570 updates, soon to be available at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-snmpv3-rfc2570bis-03.txt Abstract The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the third version of the Internet-Standard Management Framework, termed the SNMP version 3 Framework (SNMPv3). This Framework is derived from and builds upon both the original Internet- Standard Management Framework (SNMPv1) and the second Internet-Standard Management Framework (SNMPv2). The architecture is designed to be modular to allow the evolution of the Framework over time. | The document explains why using SNMPv3 instead of SNMPv1 or | SNMPv2 is strongly recommended. The document also recommends | that RFCs 1157, 1441, 1901, 1909 and 1910 be retired by moving | them to Historic status. | This document obsoletes RFC 2570. | This document is a work product of the SNMPv3 Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). From imcdonald at sharplabs.com Fri Aug 16 18:00:42 2002 From: imcdonald at sharplabs.com (McDonald, Ira) Date: Wed May 6 14:00:18 2009 Subject: JMP> Will Printers Implement SNMPv3? Message-ID: <116DB56CD7DED511BC7800508B2CA53735CD4B@mailsrvnt02.enet.sharplabs.com> Hi folks, FYI - buried below is the IESG agreeing that SNMPv1 and SNMPv2 will reclassified as Historic (that is, REMOVED from the 'standards-track') as part of the advancement of SNMPv3 to (full) Standard status. Cheers, - Ira McDonald PS - Ron Bergman agrees with me that there is probably no printer in the universe that CURRENTLY implements SNMPv3. Anyone planning to do so? This de-certification of SNMPv1 strikes me as a problem for vendors of non-network-infrastructure network-connected boxes. -----Original Message----- From: The IESG [mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: IETF-Announce; @tislabs.com Cc: RFC Editor; Internet Architecture Board; snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com Subject: Document Action: Introduction to Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework to Informational The IESG has approved the internet draft Introduction to Version 3 of the Internet-Standard Management Framework as an Informational RFC. The IESG also agrees with the recommendation to reclassify RFCs 1157, 1441, 1901, 1909 and 1910 as Historic and has approved this reclassification. This document is the product of the SNMPv3 Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Randy Bush and Bert Wijnen. Technical Summary This document is an introduction to the third version of the Internet-Standard Management Framework, termed the SNMP version 3 Management Framework (SNMPv3). It describes the relationship between the SNMP version 3 (SNMPv3) specifications and the specifications of the SNMP version 1 (SNMPv1) Management Framework, the SNMP version 2 (SNMPv2) Management Framework, and the Community-based Administrative Framework for SNMPv2. It also provides a roadmap to the multiple documents which contain the relevant specifications. The document further recommends reclassification of RFCs 1157, 1441, 1901, 1909 and 1910 as Historic and explains why. Working Group Summary The Working Group reached consensus on this document and its recommendation. Protocol Quality Bert Wijnen and Randy Bush reviewed the specification for the IESG. Note to RFC Editor: Please add the following to the end of section 7.8: Work is underway to specify how AES is to be used within the User-based Security Model (USM). This will be a separate document.