I think all of this is good work -- is it possible to achieve the goals of the Cloud Print WG charter by "deferring" the PWG print job ticket work? Possibly to another group operating in parallel ?
Just spit-balling here...I think the PWG needs a cloud print "story" fairly soon.
On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Zehler, Peter wrote:
>> The "PWG Print Job Ticket and Associated Capabilities" specification is
> not bound to Cloud Printing. Cloud Printing is one environment that
> would benefit from an open specification for Print Job Tickets and the
> standardization for the representation of the capabilities and defaults.
> All we are really doing is splitting out the job ticket, capabilities
> and defaults from the PWG semantic model. This, of course, is based on
> IPP and enjoys wide support across the industry. We have an XML schema
> encoding that will be released along with the specification.
>>> Peter Zehler
>> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701
>>> -----Original Message-----
> From: cloud-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:cloud-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
> Randy Turner
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:24 PM
> To: cloud at pwg.org> Subject: Re: [Cloud] Minutes posted for today's face-to-face meeting
>> Hi Guys,
>> I'm assuming all of this job ticket discussion is reusable outside of
> "Cloud" applications ? Or we only talking about "Cloud-specific"
> attributes of print-job-tickets ?
>> If this discussion is NOT cloud-specific, then I would hope that this
> discussion does not artificially bog down the progress of a Cloud
> Printing solution...
>>> On Dec 7, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Michael Sweet wrote:
>>>> I have posted the minutes from today's face-to-face to:
>>>>>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/minutes/cloud-f2f-minutes-20111207.pdf>>>> Action items:
>>>> - Justin to work with Microsoft Legal on the appropriate
> citation/reference to MSPS based on the new license for inclusion with
> the MSPS content in the mapping document, and any process for the PWG to
> make a formal request
>> - Ron or Bill to post a call for wider participation of driver
> developers for the XPS/MSPS stuff
>> - Mike to make "first-index" in JPS3 1-based instead of 0-based
>> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>> cloud mailing list
>>cloud at pwg.org>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud>>>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> cloud mailing list
>cloud at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud>
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.