attachment-0001
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>Print finisher mib</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=821424115-30102001>One
more time.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=821424115-30102001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=821424115-30102001> Ron</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=821424115-30102001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Harrington, David
[mailto:dbh@enterasys.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, October 29, 2001 5:47
PM<BR><B>To:</B> Bert Wijnen (E-mail);
'Ron.Bergman@Hitachi-hkis.com'<BR><B>Subject:</B> Print finisher
mib<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>Hi,</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>comments on finisher mib 12</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>Issue 6: The second paragraph of 5.2 is still incorrect. For
security reasons, not implementation reasons, it is possible that, **due to
administrative configuration**, not all objetcs will be accessible. SNMP
requires certain error codes or exception codes be returned. One cannot design
the mib to avoid this. The behavior as described will be non-compliant to SNMP
rules.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Issue 4 still exists in section 5.2.</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>The security section discusses making objects read-only to make
them secure. This may or may not be adequate. This can prevent them from being
modifed, but it doesn't prevent disclosure of the information to unauthorized
personnel. Making the object read-only also makes them far less useful, since
nobody can modify these objects using SNMP to modify the operational
characteristics of the device. This really defeats the purpose. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Issue 16: The prtGeneralConfigChanges identifies when the
finDevice table changes? I don't really think so. The values of read-write
entries can be modified, but the onl;y way an application can determine which
rows have changed is to compare every entry in the table looking for changes.
This is horrible for management applications.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>Issue 19: I think you missed the point here. You have two enums
that are binary opposites - known and unknown. What is there that is other, that
is is not known or unknown? </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=2>my $.02</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>dbh</FONT> </P>
<P><FONT size=2>David Harrington</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Director, Network
Management Architecture</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Enterasys Networks, Inc.</FONT>
<BR><FONT size=2>dbh@enterasys.com</FONT> </P></BODY></HTML>