IDS> DRAFT: IETF NEA proposal

IDS> DRAFT: IETF NEA proposal

IDS> DRAFT: IETF NEA proposal

wamwagner at comcast.net wamwagner at comcast.net
Fri Aug 15 14:13:07 EDT 2008


Randy,

This appears to cover the essense. I have two little quibbles.

1. In forwarding enable, " forwarding  of network packets between interfaces" is perhaps inappropriate since one of the main concerns is communication of infromation presented on  PSTN or local interfaces onto the network.

2. In time source, I suggest that "onboard clock/calendar chip" is too specific and just onboard date-time clock is preferable.

Thanks,

Bill Wagner




-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Dave Whitehead <david at lexmark.com> 

Randy, 

Looks good.  Two comments about Configuration State: 

1>  We should mandate the use of a cryptographically secure hash function (SHA256/512) 

2>  Vendors provide the set of available configuration items but the customer selects which items to include in the hash -- some they care about, some they don't. 

David H. Whitehead
Development Engineer
Lexmark International, Inc.
859.825.4914
davidatlexmarkdotcom 


Randy Turner <rturner at amalfisystems.com> 
Sent by: owner-ids at pwg.org 
08/15/08 04:02 AM Toids at pwg.org 
cc
SubjectIDS> DRAFT: IETF NEA proposal







Hi All,

Please read the attached RTF and provide any feedback you may have...

Please excuse the VERY simple, raw formatting I'm using - this has to be
in the simplest ASCII text form possible for eventual emailing to the
NEA
mailing list.

For now, just concentrate on the content :) :)

Thanks!
Randy


[attachment "draft-nea-proposal.rtf" deleted by Dave Whitehead/Lex/Lexmark] 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/ids/attachments/20080815/d0694a17/attachment.html


More information about the Ids mailing list