If you have something to discuss, you can bring it up during the
Agenda bashing session - I think we've already made our proposal and
portions of it were introduced into the PA-TNC document in a previous
draft - I'm not sure what you mean by "on their radar".
On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Farrell, Lee wrote:
> The NEA is holding their meeting on the 23rd, and the agenda is
> focusing on a review of comments on the latest two draft documents:
>> Agenda for IETF 74 NEA WG meeting
>> Date: Monday, March 23, 2009
> Time: 1300-1500 PDT (GMT-0700)
> WG Charter: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/nea-charter.html> WG Tools: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea> WG email: nea at ietf.org>> 1300 Administrivia
> Blue Sheets
> Jabber & Minute scribes
> Agenda bashing
> 1305 WG Status
> 1310 Discuss PB-TNC (recent changes and WGLC comments)
> 1400 Discuss PA-TNC (recent changes and WGLC comments)
> 1450 Review and Revise Milestones
> 1500 Adjourn
>> What information exactly is it that the IDS group would like to have
> discussed by and/or proposed to this group? It does not appear that
> they have us on their radar, nor am I aware of any recent
> communication from the IDS group to them.
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: nea-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:nea-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Stephen Hanna
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 1:29 PM
> To: nea at ietf.org> Subject: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC
>> New versions of PA-TNC and PB-TNC have been posted.
> These include all changes for which there was WG consensus. All open
> issues are now closed. The new documents are available at these URLs:
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-03.txt>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-03.txt>> Therefore, I am starting a Working Group Last Call on these
> documents. Please review them and send any comments or questions to
> the nea at ietf.org email list.
>> This Working Group Last Call will close at 5 PM EST on Friday, March
> 20, 2009.
>> We have chosen a two week WGLC period so that we can have all
> comments received and ready to discuss before the NEA meeting at
> IETF 74. However, if you feel that two weeks is not enough time,
> please email the NEA list and we will consider an extension.
>> In any case, now is the time for all NEA WG participants to perform
> a careful review of these specifications and raise any comments,
> concerns, corrections, or questions that you may have. Please take
> the time to do so before the end of WGLC.
> Nea mailing list
>Nea at ietf.org>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...