Sorry, wasn't able to call in...
1. Second paragraph, second sentence doesn't make sense:
By standardizing common Health Assessment attributes for these
powerful devices (Network Printers, Multi-Function Devices, Network
Scanners, etc.) should be incorporated into commercial network
2. Page 4, third paragraph; "can be divided into two areas of information: ..." seems a little awkward. Maybe just "can be divided into two areas of information: asset management and health assessment", and move the remaining sentences in this paragraph below the lists and use the same "health assessment" terminology in the second list at the bottom of the page (instead of "security and health factors") to tie it all together.
It might also be good to note that this is a work in progress and that the MPSA members should let the NAC vendors know they want support for this stuff?
On Oct 27, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Murdock, Joe wrote:
> I’ve posted the first (incomplete) draft of the MPSA IDS article. Please look at it and make suggestions/comments. We’ll discuss in the teleconference on 10/28
> Joe Murdock
> Principal Engineer and Researcher
> Co-Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security
> Sharp Labs of America
> 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd
> Camas, WA 98607
> (360) 817-7542
>jmurdock at sharplabs.com>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> ids mailing list
>ids at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ids
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...