IPP> PRO - Updated "Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols"

IPP> PRO - Updated "Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols"

IPP> PRO - Updated "Mapping between LPD and IPP Protocols"

Robert Herriot Robert.Herriot at Eng.Sun.COM
Tue Jul 15 14:43:23 EDT 1997


> From jkm at underscore.com Tue Jul 15 10:11:10 1997
 
> Line 298: "...we need to map the LPD query format to IPP attributes."
> What is meant by the "LPD query format"?  In LPD, the client asks for
> either the "short" or the "long" version of a query; no further
> granularity is available, right?
> 
> 
> I think all the LPD syntax stuff in the document is confusing (at best)
> and adds little to the overall value of the document.  The syntax is
> described in a different form than that of RFC 1179 (which has no form,
> actually).  All that is needed in this mapping document are references
> to the appropriate terms and section numbers of RFC 1179; it should be
> more than sufficient to assume the reader has knowledge of RFC 1179,
> and that this mapping document should not "spoon-feed" the reader.


I was referring to the format of the long and short response which PSIS
but not RFC 1179 specifies.



More information about the Ipp mailing list