> From jkm at underscore.com Fri Sep 26 18:19:10 1997
> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 21:11:34 -0400
> From: Jay Martin <jkm at underscore.com>
> To: papowell at astart2.astart.com> CC: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: Re: IPP> PRO - Use of special port for IPP
>> Why can't we have it both ways? That is, assume the standard default
> port 80 can be used, but also specify a "standard alternative port"?
This is my proposal. It would make life much easier if there was a
;well known; alternative port