IPP> Directory Schema attribute question - resolved

IPP> Directory Schema attribute question - resolved

IPP> Directory Schema attribute question - resolved

Harry Lewis harryl at us.ibm.com
Thu Dec 11 10:56:45 EST 1997


Sorry for the traffic. I think I resolved my question by reading sectio=
n 4.2
Job Template Attributes. It seems confusing, at first, but I guess not =
so much
once you get used to it. Just for readability and understanding, I'd pr=
efer if
we not use phrases like "The "xxx-default" default value attribute
describes...(the default)...". It's confusing whether copies, copies-de=
fault
and copies-supported are 1 or 3 attributes... I'd say 3 but really just=


different names for the same attribute when it is either supplied, defa=
ulted or
queried. So, we could just say "The xxx-default" value describes... (th=
e
default)...". Anyway, I'm sure you've all been through these discussion=
s and
it's too late for this round. I think I'm getting it! I'll dig deeper b=
efore I
ask another question.


Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems




----- Forwarded by Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM on 12/10/97 10:56 PM -----




ipp-owner at pwg.org on 12/10/97 06:24:16 PM
Please respond to ipp-owner at pwg.org @ internet
To: ipp at pwg.org @ internet, SISAACSON at novell.com @ internet
cc:
Subject: IPP> Directory Schema attribute question




This is either a nit or a misunderstanding on my part. Appx E of the Mo=
del doc
lists attributes to be included in a directory schema (great idea!) but=
 does
not always refer exactly to the same name. Example finishings-supported=
 vs.
finishings in section 4.2.6. Is this a lingering editorial, or am I com=
pletely
missing the boat somewhere on attribute names?


Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
=



More information about the Ipp mailing list