Keith,
Thanks for the update.
This sets an end to further discussions about IF and WHY we should have
an ipp: scheme.
We can now concentrate any further discussion on the details on HOW to
implement ipp:
(sorry Don and Paul)
Carl-Uno
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 1998 12:42 PM
> To: ipp at pwg.org> Cc: moore at cs.utk.edu> Subject: IPP> report from IESG telechat
>>> 1. Several members of the IESG requested more time to review the IPP
> documents. They will be discussed again at the next IESG meeting,
> which should take place on 30 July.
>> 2. With regard to the use of http: URLs at the HTTP layer, and
> ipp: used everywhere else: Nobody on IESG had a problem with this.
>> Keith
>