IPP> FW: Typo and unclear definition in draft-ietf-tls-protocol-05.txt

IPP> FW: Typo and unclear definition in draft-ietf-tls-protocol-05.txt

IPP> FW: Typo and unclear definition in draft-ietf-tls-protocol-05.txt

Manros, Carl-Uno B cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com
Mon Oct 5 17:43:50 EDT 1998


FYI,

TLS still seems to be some time away....

Carl-Uno

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Newman [mailto:chris+ietf-tls at INNOSOFT.COM] 
Sent: Monday, October 05, 1998 10:46 AM
To: IETF Transport Layer Security WG
Subject: Re: Typo and unclear definition in
draft-ietf-tls-protocol-05.txt


On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Rene Eberhard wrote:
> BTW: When can we expect the next draft / rfc?

I'd like to know the answer to that as well.

Now that PKIX part 1 is approved, all that's preventing the publication of
TLS as an RFC is the need for a new draft which addresses the
clarifications discussed over the last several months.

		- Chris



---
You are currently subscribed to ietf-tls as: [cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.coM]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-ietf-tls-641F at lists.consensus.com



More information about the Ipp mailing list