Larry Masinter just pointed out that we do not make "votes" in the IETF,
so this is to correctly be labeled as a "poll".
Makes a lot of difference!
From: Larry Masinter [mailto:masinter at parc.xerox.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 1998 7:17 PM
To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
Subject: RE: IPP> ADM - Results of voting on the NLO Issues
It would help if you would call it a poll of the working group
for consensus instead of a "vote". And then it doesn't matter
so much if not everyone votes.
> The voting period for our NLO issues has just expired. There were fewer
> votes than I had expected, hope I did not miss anybody who
> actually sent in a vote. Among the votes we have so far, it seems that
> everybody are in favor of the proposed simplifications.
>> A number of people who are known to have implementations, did not
> bother to vote. This is worrying.
>> I know that some people are still waiting for the new test scripts to find
> out exactly how their implementation reacts.
>> Let us discuss this again in tomorrow's phone conference.
>> Here is the list so far:
>> IPP Member NLO 2 NLO 3 NLO 4
> ========== ===== ===== =====
> Bob Herriot Y? N?
> Ira McDonald Y Y
> Michael Sweet Y Y Y
> Hugo Parra Y
> Stuart Rowley Y Y
> Stephanie Suzuki Y Y Y
> Ron Bergman Y Y Y
> Henrik Holst Y
> Maulik Desai Y Y Y
> Yuji Sasaki Y
> Brian Glass Y
> Peter Michalek Y Y Y
>> Carl-Uno Manros
> Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox Corporation
> 701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
> Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
> Email: manros at cp10.es.xerox.com>