At 10:29 AM 2/19/99 -0500, James Rafferty wrote:
>Tom,
>>At 03:46 PM 2/18/99 -0800, Hastings, Tom N wrote:
>>Keith,
>>>>Thanks. So it looks like the IPP Model and Semantics 'mimeMediaType' value
>>of 'image/tiff' should point to the IANA Registry, not a particular RFC.
>>>Yes, I'd agree with this.
>>For future work and an extension to IPP to be developed in the IFAX over IPP
>>WG, we will need to solve the Interoperability Considerations problem called
>>out below where there are different profiles for TIFF.
>>>Please note that there is one additional IANA consideration that was
>specified in Annex B of RFC 2301, on the two values that HAVE been
>specified for the TIFF application parameter ("faxbw" and "faxcolor" ). I
>have pointed out this omission to Keith Moore, so that IANA hopefully can
>finish bringing the image/tiff registry up to date. Also, please note
>that RFC 2302 also contains a template for the registration of future TIFF
>application parameter values, if they are needed.
>The IANA image/tiff registration now also reflects this.
see: http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/image/tiff
James
*------------------------------------------------*
James Rafferty
President, Human Communications LLC
12 Kevin Drive
Danbury, CT 06811-2901
USA
Voice/Fax: +1-203-746-4367
Email/Internet Fax: JRafferty at worldnet.att.netJ_Rafferty_HC at compuserve.comjrafferty at humancomm.com
HC Web Site: http://www.humancomm.com
*---------------------------------------------------