IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest Authentication

IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest Authentication

IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest Authentication

Paul Moore paulmo at microsoft.com
Thu Apr 22 21:15:15 EDT 1999


"I know that Paul and others are fully capable of doing that if you want
to."

I (MS) already do it, I have no issue with doing it at all and never have. I
intend to ship strong security. MS is 100% committed to security for our
customers. I have already demonstrated it in beta products (that I know you
have access to and that most of the active WG members also have access to)


-----Original Message-----
From: Manros, Carl-Uno B [mailto:cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 1999 6:03 PM
To: Keith Moore; SHIVAUN_ALBRIGHT at HP-Roseville-om2.om.hp.com
Cc: don at lexmark.com; ipp at pwg.org; Paul Moore
Subject: RE: IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest
Authentication 


All, 

I fully agree with Keith. I have said it before, and I repeat it again, it
is now time for the members of the IPP WG to start behaving like an IETF WG.


Don't waste more of our time on non-Internet scenarios. 

Let us focus on how to PROVIDE the required security features rather than
fighting them!
I know that Paul and others are fully capable of doing that if you want to.

Carl-Uno

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 1999 4:56 PM
> To: SHIVAUN_ALBRIGHT at HP-Roseville-om2.om.hp.com
> Cc: don at lexmark.com; moore at cs.utk.edu; ipp at pwg.org; 
> paulmo at microsoft.com
> Subject: Re: IPP> Re: PRO - Issue 32: Use of Basic & Digest
> Authentication 
> 
> 
> > I agree with Don.  Mandating that all printers have 
> security in order to be 
> > IPP/1.1 compliant is forcing a requirement on printers that 
> may not be 
> > warranted for their market segments.  Certain market 
> segments may not want or 
> > need security on their Printers and forcing this on the 
> device manufacturer 
> > to claim compliancy is unacceptable.
> 
> you guys are wasting your time and mine.  this issue is not 
> even on the table.
> 
> if you want an IETF standard, you've got to have strong 
> authentication.
> period, full stop, end of discussion.
> 
> Keith
> 



More information about the Ipp mailing list