IPP> FW: Errata in RFC 2911: "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model an d Semantics"

IPP> FW: Errata in RFC 2911: "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model an d Semantics"

IPP> FW: Errata in RFC 2911: "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model an d Semantics"

Hastings, Tom N hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com
Wed Sep 18 15:12:17 EDT 2002


This very minor RFC 2911 Errata has been posted finally.

To see any RFC Errata, go to:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html

Then bug on the RFC Errata box.

They are sorted in reverse order by RFC number.

If you've looked before, make sure you tell your Browser to refresh or you
won't find the latest Errata.

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org [mailto:rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 10:13
To: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org; hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com
Cc: hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com; carl at manros.com
Subject: Re: FW: IPP> Errata in RFC 2911: "Internet Printing
Protocol/1.1: Mod el and Semantics"


Tom,

We apologize for the delay.  We have updated our errata page to refelct
the errors indicated below.

Thank you.

RFC Editor


> From: "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>
> To: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
> Cc: "Hastings, Tom" <hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com>, "Manros, Carl-Uno" 
<carl at manros.com>
> Subject: FW: IPP> Errata in RFC 2911: "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Mod
el 
and Semantics"
> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:32:16 -0700 
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> 
> I submitted this Errata in July.  It hasn't been posted yet.  Is there
> anything more that I have to do?  Does it have to be approved by anyone,
> such as our AD?
> 
> Its not critical, though a recent I-D that is going through last call is
> assuming that the errata is true and accepted, so it would be good to post
> the errata.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 17:52
> To: rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
> Cc: ipp at pwg.org
> Subject: IPP> Errata in RFC 2911: "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model
> and Se mantics"
> 
> 
> This note points out two errata in RFC 2911 regarding the ranges of status
> codes.
> 
> Section 13, which is "APPENDIX B:  Status Codes and Suggested Status Code
> Messages" has:
> 
>       "redirection" - 0x0200 to 0x02FF
> 
> which should be:
> 
>       "redirection" - 0x0300 to 0x03FF
> 
> and has:
> 
>    The top half (128 values) of each range (0x0n40 to 0x0nFF, for n = 0
>    to 5) is reserved for vendor use within each status code class.
> 
> which should be:
> 
>    The top half (128 values) of each range (0x0n80 to 0x0nFF, for n = 0
>    to 5) is reserved for vendor use within each status code class.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Tom Hastings
> IPP WG Editor



More information about the Ipp mailing list