Forwarded, Ron you need to re-register
Carl-Uno
Tom,
Glad to see that this document is being maintained!
Some comments:
1. For what it's worth, I don't see RFC2639 on your list (IPP 1.0
Implementer's Guide).
2. Issue #1 (updating RFC2567, RFC2568, and RFC2569) This was discussed
in a previous meeting and it was agreed that there was nothing to be
gained by re-publishing these. We can find more productive tasks if
anyone is looking for work!
3. Issues #3 and #4 (a champion for INDP and mailto notifications (note
that #4 also incorrectly states INDP not mailto)) I propose that someone
(Carl-Uno ?) query to see if anyone is interested. I would certainly
be interested in working on mailto.
(I don't think this is going to make it to the list. My email address
has changed again and I can't recall if I resubscribed to the IPP list.)
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 3:19 PM
To: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: IPP> Status of all 32 IPP Documents - downloaded [could someone
presen t in New Orleans?]
I've down loaded the status of all of the 32 IPP documents at:
The durable URL, in case someone wants to point to it from the IPP web site:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/document-status/status-of-ipp-docs-latest.pdfftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/document-status/status-of-ipp-docs-latest.doc
The clean version:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/document-status/status-of-ipp-docs-021101.pdfftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/document-status/status-of-ipp-docs-021101.doc
Version with change tracking to show the changes since last June:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/document-status/status-of-ipp-docs-021101-rev.
pdf
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/document-status/status-of-ipp-docs-021101-rev.
doc
Its five pages long. Unfortunately, I am unable to attend the PWG meeting
in New Orleans next week. Can someone present the IPP Document status
during the Plenary in New Orleans as part of the IPP status report?
Here is the Table of Contents:
1 Published IPP RFCs (that haven't been
obsoleted):................................................................
1
2 Newly published RFCs, September 2002:
............................................................................
.. 2
3 Obsoleted
RFCs........................................................................
............................................... 2
4 IPP WG IETF Standards Track IPP Internet-Drafts
............................................................... 2
5 IETF IPP Documents submitted by
individuals.................................................................
..... 3
6 IPP Internet-Drafts no longer on the IETF Standard Track
.................................................... 3
7 Approved PWG IEEE-ISTO IPP standards
............................................................................
4
8 Proposed PWG IEEE-ISTO IPP standards
............................................................................
. 4
Thanks,
Tom