Thanks. Do you have a handle on what needs to be done to clear the IESG
review comments? Here's the one that's blocking:
"The Security Considerations section should be more explicit about the
security required for administrative operations. The fact that these
operations may need to be protected, even in an environment where printing
related operations may not be."
A few months ago I made arrangements to get some help from a person (Kurt
Zeilenga, Kurt at OpenLDAP.org) who does some work in the security area, if
that would help. Please contact him directly if needed.
This doesn't have to be very deep. A few paragraphs will probably do the
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 2:36 PM
> To: Scott Hollenbeck
> Cc: carl at manros.com; 'Carl Kugler'; Hastings, Tom N;
>ipp at pwg.org; harryl at us.ibm.com; mike at easysw.com; bob at herriot.com> Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipp-ops-set2-03
>> Thanks for helping us out on this document in the IETF. I'm
> volunteering to
> be the point of contact, since I was the last editor of the document.
>> Tom Hastings
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Hollenbeck [mailto:sah at 428cobrajet.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 07:35
> To: harryl at us.ibm.com; mike at easysw.com; bob at herriot.com> Cc: carl at manros.com; 'Carl Kugler'; hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com;
>ipp at pwg.org> Subject: RE: draft-ietf-ipp-ops-set2-03
>> I've been in touch with the Security Area Directors, Russ
> Housley and Steve
> Bellovin. Russ has identified and asked someone to help craft an
> appropriate Security Considerations section. I just need to
> know who his
> point of contact should be.
>> Bob Herriot has volunteered to finish the writing in a
> private reply to me.
> Harry Lewis has also replied to the WG mailing list. Which
> of you would be
> the appropriate editor at this point?