IPP> RFC: Add required document-format values for IPP v2?

IPP> RFC: Add required document-format values for IPP v2?

IPP> RFC: Add required document-format values for IPP v2?

Dave Whitehead david at lexmark.com
Thu Jul 31 14:22:20 EDT 2008


If we can agree to the correct document format, prototyping could be a
matter of minutes.

dhw



                                                                           
             Michael R Sweet                                               
             <msweet at apple.com                                             
             >                                                          To 
                                       Dave Whitehead <david at lexmark.com>  
             07/31/2008 02:02                                           cc 
             PM                        Ira McDonald                        
                                       <blueroofmusic at gmail.com>,          
                                       ipp at pwg.org, "Farrell, Lee"         
                                       <Lee.Farrell at cda.canon.com>,        
                                       owner-ipp at pwg.org,                  
                                       ptykodi at tykodi.com                  
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: IPP> RFC: Add required          
                                       document-format values for IPP v2?  
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           



Dave Whitehead wrote:
> I think option 1 may be the way to proceed (if that's what we want to
do!)
> since it would then be just another document we reference in the IPPv2x
> document.

But won't option 1 (write a new standard, reference it in IPP/2.x)
still require prototyping, etc?

Plus, I don't see how we are getting around the prototype requirements
for 2.x - we *are* adding new content WRT version numbers, and that
requires prototyping to do any kind of testing/validation between
implementations.

--
______________________________________________________________________
Michael R Sweet                        Senior Printing System Engineer




More information about the Ipp mailing list