Mike and I have just been emailing about IPP call this morning.
Mike's just starting into 3 weeks of email and I'm starting (at 2am
US EDT tomorrow morning) 3 days of Trusted Computing Group
meetings in Madrid, Spain.
You can have a Cloud call - I probably won't be able to attend
(due to Samsung tasks).
My only comment about the "progress" at the Cloud F2F is that
there are far too many first-class protocol endpoints in the Cloud
that the Client (and Print Manager) have to discover and talk to.
This is a nightmare for the IPP mapping in IPPSIX. I've talked
offline w/ Glen Petrie about this. At a minimum, I would like both
the Client and Print Manager to never talk to the Cloud Print
System Service (just make requests to Cloud Print Provider),
so that only 2 Cloud entities w/ *standards-based* interfaces are
ever exposed to the non-Cloud endpoints.
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:33 AM, William A Wagner
<wamwagner at comcast.net> wrote:
> Is there call today? I have seen no email although June F2F slides
> indicated a conference call at 3 EDT today. I do not recall this being
> rescheduled during the meeting ; I think I would have suggested a Cloud
> meeting otherwise, to try to take advantage of the momentum we had started
> to gain in the Cloud Model.
>> Bill Wagner
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.