"IPP Transaction Printing Extensions" doesn't help; in fact, it makes me think specifically of bills, statements, etc...
"IPP Transaction-Based Printing Extensions"???
On 2013-06-24, at 12:20 PM, "Petrie, Glen" <glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com> wrote:
>> I was a little surprised at your new title. "Transactional Printing" has for a very, very long time meant the "printing of voices, bills, statements, notices, checks, letters, etc.". While I have noted that it is not uncommon for PWG to "extent" the meaning of terms; might I suggest "Transaction" versus Transactional to avoid confusion.
>>> From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Michael Sweet
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 8:17 AM
> To: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: [IPP] Updated draft of IPP Transactional Printing Extensions (formerly Paid Printing Extensions)
>> I have posted an updated stable draft of the IPP Transactional Printing Extensions (formerly the IPP Paid Printing Extensions) to:
>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipptrans10-20130624.docx>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipptrans10-20130624.pdf>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipptrans10-20130624-rev.pdf>> Aside from the name change and some template changes, I've added additional terms, explanatory text, and references (including an informative reference to CIP4's PrintTalk specification) to hopefully allay any confusion and tie everything together cleanly.
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...