[IPP] WG Last Call of IPP Scan Service specification

[IPP] WG Last Call of IPP Scan Service specification

[IPP] WG Last Call of IPP Scan Service specification

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Tue May 20 19:58:42 UTC 2014


Hi Mike,

Yes, I did mean "printer-current-time" (a terribly obscure name).

But relative time isn't relevant for "printer-config-change-date-time",
right (requires real clock date/time)?

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434



On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:

> Ira,
>
> On May 19, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> ...
> Obviously, the underlying printer-date-time attribute should have
> the same conformance level as the change-xxx attributes in IPP
> Everywhere, IPP FaxOut, and IPP Scan.  This appears to me to
> be an oversight in these specs.
>
>
> I think you mean "printer-current-time", right?
>
> Yes, it is probably an oversight, but probably not critical since Clients
> don't care so much about the current time as they do the time when
> something happens.  Relative printer time can be calculated using
> printer-up-time.
>
>  _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20140520/290c136e/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list