[IPP] [PWG5100.7] Issue #64: Missing "[jobx]" and "[ippdoc]" references

[IPP] [PWG5100.7] Issue #64: Missing "[jobx]" and "[ippdoc]" references

[IPP] [PWG5100.7] Issue #64: Missing "[jobx]" and "[ippdoc]" references

Ira McDonald blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Thu Sep 7 20:29:08 UTC 2017


Hi Smith,

Given the title of 5100.7, obviously "[jobx]" should have been "this
specification"
and I agree that "[ippdoc]" should have been "[PWG5100.5]" (IPP Document
Object).

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Jan-April: 579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
May-Dec: PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434


On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:17 PM, <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:

> [Issue Unconfirmed]
>
> Page 26, footnote 12: "The [jobx] specification does not define any
> Document Description attributes. See the [ippdoc] specification."
>
> There is no reference defined for either "[jobx]" or "[ippdoc]" references.
> It may be that "[ippdoc]" is supposed to be "[pwg5100.5]".
>
> Link: http://www.pwg.org/issues/64
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20170907/c03eb586/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list