[IPP] [EXTERNAL] Feedback request on "printer-icons" and "printer-more-info-manufacturer" in PWG IPP-Infra

[IPP] [EXTERNAL] Feedback request on "printer-icons" and "printer-more-info-manufacturer" in PWG IPP-Infra

Jimmy Wu Jimmy.Wu at microsoft.com
Tue Apr 23 20:32:07 UTC 2024


Agree that the most important component is ensuring the resource is accessible with the same credentials or with no credentials.

Thanks,
Jimmy

________________________________
From: Michael Sweet
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 11:39 AM
To: Jimmy Wu
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [IPP] Feedback request on "printer-icons" and "printer-more-info-manufacturer" in PWG IPP-Infra

Jimmy,

> On Apr 22, 2024, at 2:03 PM, Jimmy Wu <Jimmy.Wu at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Michael for the initial comment.
>
> The direction you suggested also makes sense to me.
> The additional minor question is around whether the these various URI values need to have the same domain as the Infrastructure printer's own URI, assuming all other rules are in place.

Adopting the W3C's notion of "Same Origin" might make sense, although I can also see sharing common resources (standard ICC color profiles, strings files, etc.) from a CDN.  But those should either be accessible with the same credentials or with no credentials (publicly accessible).

________________________
Michael Sweet

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20240423/6e020cc6/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list