[MFD] {Disarmed} RE: Copy Service Working Group Last Call

[MFD] {Disarmed} RE: Copy Service Working Group Last Call

[MFD] {Disarmed} RE: Copy Service Working Group Last Call

Nancy.Chen at okidata.com Nancy.Chen at okidata.com
Fri Jul 16 18:28:10 UTC 2010


All,

Here are my comments:

1.  Terminology
(1) Add <service> to the list of terms defined in the "Overall" document 
Terminology section.
(2) Remove all XML element names - they are not terminolgies. 
(3) Some terms listed in Terminology are never used in the spec, should be 
removed. Some are listed as being defined in the "Overall" document, but 
never be capitalized in the spec. Please fix.
        CopyDevice, Attributes, CrossFeed direction, Element, Feed 
direction, Group Element, Hardcopy Document, Job Ticket, Local Client, 
PhysicalCopyJobTicket, Remote Client, Scan Device, Scan Region, Sequence, 
Slow Scan Direction, Template, Users, X, Y.

Section 6, 
Line 263 -
"The PWG Semantic Model" mentioned here is very confusing. If it's PWG 
Semantic Model v1.0 which only has semantics for Print Service, it does 
not have semantics for Copy Service. Currently there is no newer PWG 
Semantic Model spec that covers all MFD services yet. I think it's better 
to replace it with "MFD System".

Line 269 - "printoing" should be "printing", a typo
Line 289 - "Copy" : should be "copy job"
Line 290 - remove a duplicated "that" from "that that"
Line 294 - "Each job has exactly zero document." : please provide the 
rationale for this statement, or reference the section where the rationale 
is provided.

Section 6.1
Line 308 - "CopyServer" : should be "CopyService"

Section 7.2
Line 422 - "provide" should be "provides"

Section 7.3.1
Line 449 - "set" should be "sets"

Section 7.3.3
Line 488-489 - Elements of CopyJobProcessing that are outside the yellow 
box are said taken from PrintJobProcessing and are described in the MFD 
Overall document, but such descriptions do not exist in the Overall 
document yet.

Section 9
Line 511 - "ar" should be "are"

Section 10.2.1
Line 540 - "Conforming implementations MUST implement "all" of the model 
objects as defined in this specification in the indicated sections" : but 
not all are MANDATORY according to the Schema!!! 

Security Consideration Section
I have recommended some general security considerations for all services 
in MFD Requirements document. Please reference that document for common 
security considerations.

Section 13.1
Depending on MFD's local security site policy, encryption of the internal 
digital document might not be required. For example, for copying a section 
of book or magzine in a public library, does a public library normally 
require the internal digital doument be encrypted?

Section 13.2
I suggest to add at the beginning: "The design of Copy Service should 
include access control to Copy Service operations in accordance with the 
local site security policy."

Regards,
-Nancy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy Chen
Principal Engineer
Solutions and Technology
Oki Data
2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
Phone: (856)222-7006
Email: Nancy.Chen at okidata.com










"Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com> 
Sent by: mfd-bounces at pwg.org
07/13/2010 11:27 AM

To
<mfd at pwg.org>
cc

Subject
[MFD] {Disarmed} RE: Copy Service Working Group Last Call





The MFD Working Group Last Call for this specification ends on Friday.
Please send any comment you may have.





Peter Zehler

Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701



From: Zehler, Peter
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 1:53 PM
To: 'mfd at pwg.org'
Subject: Copy Service Working Group Last Call



All,


This is the announcement for MFD Working Group Last Call for the "Copy
Service Semantic Model and Service Interface" specification. (Only minor
changes have been made based on comments from the last Face to Face.
See the "-rev" version.)  The Last Call will end at the close of
business July 16. At the upcoming PWG Face to Face we will review the
resolution to the Last Call comments during the MFD session.   At that
point the specification should be ready for Formal Vote pending approval
of the MFD Overall specification.

Please review the specification listed below and send comments to the
MFD reflector <mailto:mfd at pwg.org
<https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd> > and cc me in
<mailto:Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
<https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd> >. I will collect the
comments for subsequent resolution at teleconferences prior to the face
to face meeting.

The Last Call version of the "Copy Service Semantic Model and Service
Interface" specification is now available at:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/wd-mfdcopymodel10-20100701.pdf
(As usual the .docx version as well as -rev.pdf and -rev.docx are
available in the same directory.)


Thanks,

Pete












Peter Zehler

Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701




--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


_______________________________________________
mfd mailing list
mfd at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20100716/712e7434/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20100716/712e7434/attachment.htm>


More information about the mfd mailing list