[MFD] MFD teleconference Thursday 11/18 3pm EST

[MFD] MFD teleconference Thursday 11/18 3pm EST

[MFD] MFD teleconference Thursday 11/18 3pm EST

Zehler, Peter Peter.Zehler at xerox.com
Mon Nov 15 19:56:52 UTC 2010


There will be an MFD conference call at 3:00 PM EST (12:00 PM PST)
Thursday
November 18.  Below is the proposed agenda
 
 
 
The meeting is held in accord with the PWG Intellectual Property Policy.
 
 
 
teleconference:
 
Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239 
 
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 
 
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 
 
Attendee access code: (by request only, please contact me if you do not
have
it)
 

Live Meeting:

<https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join?id=PWG-MFD&role=attend&pw=Let
MeIn>
 
 
 
 
Agenda:
 
 
 
1. Identify Minute Taker
 
2. Approval of minutes from 10/4/10 meeting
<ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/minutes/pwg-mfd-minutes-20101104.pdf>  
 
3. Agenda bashing 
 
4. Discuss current issues with MFD model (See below)
 
5. Discuss outstanding Overall Specification issues.
 
6. Next steps 
 

 

 

Current MFD Model issues:

1.     Scan Job Status,  EmailOut Job Status, FaxOut Job Status , have
both ImagesCompleted and the full set of <Service>JobCounters which
includes several Images counters. Print Job Status, Copy Job Status,
FaxIn Job Status and  EmailIn Job Status do not include an impressions
completed, but do include the <Service>JobCounters

<PZ>PrintJobStatus does include ImpressionsCompleted.  Copy should as
well.  Email In and FaxIn may need ImagesCompleted since the processing
of a job may not result in hard copy out.  Those jobs always accept some
number of images.</PZ>

2.     Are the Service Elements the same counters as Job oriented
counter values or are they separate?   If they are separate, does
persistence have any significance?

<PZ>Job counters have a scope of a single job.  Service counters have a
scope of all the jobs processed by the service.  At this time all
service/job related counters share a common data type.  The recent
change to accommodate persistence had a side effect I missed.  The
resolution is either to redefine the job level counters or to mandate a
lifetime value for the persistence.  I prefer the former resolution.
Another side effect is that Job counters have counts only applicable to
a service (i.e., Availability, Monitoring).  I believe the data types
for the Job/Document counters needs to be corrected.  It should be
discussed next week at the MFD meeting.</PZ>

3.     What is the difference between  the Images Completed count and
the Work Images count?

<PZ>It is my opinion that ImagesCompleted and ImpressionCompleted should
map to the counters DataStream Images/Impressions count.  My assumption
is that the status level simple counter would be used by applications to
show work progress.  This should be discussed next week as well.</PZ>

4.     Why is there a separate  images completed counter for some
Services, but none (or no corresponding impressions counter) for others?

<PZ>Late night editing sessions...constant interruptions to do my day
job...service by service definition as opposed to an overall approach.
Bottom line is that I think it needs to be fixed.</PZ>

5.     Should JobAccountingSheets, JobErrorSheets, JobSheetsCol be
aligned with InsertSheet? (i.e. definition of media as a choice between
MediaCol or a sequence of Media & MediaTypye)?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter Zehler

Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com <mailto:Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com> 
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20101115/9b3bd655/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list