[MFD] Correction! MFD Model and Common Semantics last call draft

[MFD] Correction! MFD Model and Common Semantics last call draft

[MFD] Correction! MFD Model and Common Semantics last call draft

William Wagner wamwagner at comcast.net
Wed Feb 23 07:37:18 UTC 2011


Sorry, the links were wrong in the last message!

 

Many thanks to those who have laboriously documented problems in the MFD
Model and Common Semantics specification. Many of the problems were a result
of a strange MS Word action which replaced hyperlinks to certain pictures
with the pictures themselves. This did not show up in my original MS Word
file, but did in the PDF versions and the MSWord that Pete posted. I have
gone back to my last MS Word version and believe that I have eliminated this
effect (sometimes requiring removing the hyperlink).

 

I have also addressed Nancy's comment and the other comments listed below,
in the ways indicated. These have been format  and typo fixes.Other items I
have left for discussion. The updated drafts are at 

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/wd-mfdmodel10-20110222.pdf  and

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/wd-mfdmodel10-20110222.docx 

 (Unfortunately, line numbers are page number are somewhat changed)

 

Please keep the comments coming.

 

Thanks,

 

Bill Wagner

 

Items considered  are: Reported  Issues considered in MFD Model and Comon
Semantics Last Call

SECTION 2.2.1                   page 22   figure 6 Primary interfaces is
missing a line from scanner subunit to Email Out [fixed]

Section 2.2.2   page 24         duplicate graphic of figure 7 on page 26. [X
problem]

Section 2.4.2   page 30         line 825 job produces 1 ton should be job
produces 1 to N [Fixed]

Section 3.2      page 48         line 1149 missing reference source[X
problem]

Section 3.6      page 60         line 1212 missing reference source[X
problem]

Section 3.10    page 70         line 1280 missing reference source[X
problem]

                                            line 1282 figure 45 should be
figure 44[X problem]

Section 4.3      page 95         duplicate graphic of figure 62[X problem]

Section 4.3.1   page 102       10th attribute from the top, is annotation a
instance of imposition, if not it should be added to the graphic [?]

Section 4.3.3   page 112       duplicate graphic of figure 73[X problem]

                                            Line 1644 References figure 73
but no graphic below the reference. [X problem]

                       page 113       duplicate graphic of figure 74[X
problem]

                       page 114       duplicate graphic of figure 75[X
problem]

Section 4.7.1   page 129       line 1759 reference source not found[X
problem]

Section 5.1      page 132       line 1829 reference source not found[X
problem]

                       page 133       graphic missing caption Image Job
Status Element[X problem]

                       Page 135      Figure 84 caption not bolded [fixed]

Section 5.2.1   page 141       does imposition fulfill requirement for
annotation programming[?]

Section 5.2.3   page 150       duplicate graphic of figure 94[X problem]

Section 7.1      page 165       Figure 102 graphic shows up on this page but
is referenced in the document as being on page 167[X problem]

Section 7.1.4   page 167       line 2126 Scheduling of Jobs should be
scheduling of the service's Jobs. [fixed]

Section 7.2.1. page 168       duplicate graphic of figure 103[X problem]

                       page 171       duplicate graphic of figure 103[X
problem]

Section 7.3.1.3                     page 183             line 2423 reference
source not found[X problem]

                                            line 2424 acel<service>job
should be Cancel<service>Job [Not found]

 


==================

Lines 913-915: ArtBox section indented too much [fixed]

 

Lines 617, 1149, 1212, 1280, 1759, 1829, 1835, 2423: Bad references? [X
problem]

 

Tables 21, 28: Bad references? [X problem]

 

Sections 7.3.1.14, 7.3.1.15: I am not sure the suggestion to drop
Hold/Release<service>Job is appropriate here, as we don't define required
operations for any services. Better to just note the deprecation and then
not require them in the individual service documents as appropriate.

 

=================

 

Page 2 line 58: Title here doesn't match the front. [fixed]

 

Page 2 Footer: Change all footers to 2009-2011.[fixed]

 

Page 12 line 539: This sentence is restating the same sentence from the
previous page

scope section....(remove) [fixed]

 

Page 19 line 617: broken reference (there are 15 total broken references
from a search

on the word Error! in the PDF) [X problem]

 

Page 22 line 669: the word Hardcopy doesn't need up-casing. [where Hardcopy
meant Hardcopy Document (defined term), the word Document was generally
added. Also, except in boiler plate, the word "document" when referring to a
specification was changed to specification, with Document referring to the
defined term.]

 

Page 25 line 707: the words " more appropriately" are not necessary
[Disagree- the System spec a does not exist at this time, so are not
referring to an existing spec, just saying that this information is more
appropriate elsewhere]

 

Page 28 line 767: Content Regions should be Content Region.[fixed]

 

Page 29 line 805: the acronym SDSF is used before it's defined, need to
spell it out here

or move the definitions before. [fixed by removing statement]

 

Page 30 line 825: "1 ton Documents"????[fixed]

 

Page 31 line 868: No figure reference after the word Figure.[fixed]

 

Page 33 line 901: double periods in sentence [fixed]

 

Page 35 line 944: PDF file shows two RED commas in the sentence. [fixed]

 

Page 38 line 989: Need a period, not a comma at the end of the line. [fixed]

 

Page 40 line 1025: Missing (REF) which is in RED. [fixed]

 

page 41 line 1044: Table 4 has forward references listed in the description.
[?]

 

General comment on description tables (many of the tables have either blank
description

columns or blank reference columns....or both....unless the Elements are
defined in this

document a reference needs to be included in ALL Element listings in tables.

 

Page 77 line 1328 second to last table row: The description for Any is
Extension point for status...

should be Extension point for OutputChannelStatus.[fixed]

 

General comment on the Description of the extension point Any....There is a
very inconsistent

style of how these are described in the tables (some are blank, some just
say Extension point, some

say Extension point for something and some say "extension point for vendor
differentiation and 

implementation-specific extensions while maintaing interoperability) Suggest
simply changing

all to Extension point for "exactly what they extend". [to be discussed]Also
the word "Any" is inconsistently upcased or not, sometimes all lower case
sometimes upcased throughout the tables. [fixed]

 

Page 77 line 1338: need a period at the end of the sentence. [fixed]

 

Page 82 line 1365 last row in table: Example of the General comment on the
Any extension point,

and Processor is spelled wrong. [fixed]

 

Page 86 line 1387 row 12 of table: unnecessary period in third column, and
odd character in forth. [fixed]

 

Page 87 line 1401: period spacing mid-line. [fixed]

 

Page 91 line 1428: double semi-colons[fixed]

 

Page 91 line 1450: What's the star for?? [fixed]

 

Page 93 line 1486: spacing of comma mid-line. [fixed]

 

Page 93 line 1492: Section 0 reference (broken) [fixed]

 

Page 94 line 1506: Sentence is split by the figure. [X-problem]]

 

Page 100 line 1565 Resolution row: What's the star for?? [fixed]

 

Page 107 line 1605: comma,period in mid-line[fixed]

 

Page 113 line 1647: Why's the word (Copy) in the figure name?? (multiple
instances) [refers to Service used for examples of Service Specific elements
- changed to Copy Service Examples]

 

Page 122 line 1704: Section 0 broken reference [fixed]

 

Page 122 line 1706: Internal reference without the word section. [fixed]

 

Page 122 line 1715: need period at the end of the line [fixed]

 

Page 126 line 1735,1736: comma and period spacing issues (3 instances)

 

Page 128 line 1744 StateReasons row: odd symbols in third column.[symbol
means paragraph - changed to word "paragraph"]

 

Page 128 line 1746: Name of Counter Spec. is not complete. [typically use
colloquial name rather than full title, but corrected reference]

 

Page 130 line 1768-1804: Text is BLUE in the PDF. [fixed]

 

Page 134: Table has odd symbols in column 4 and Counter spec name/REF are
incorrect. [fixed]Symbols occur in many tables in the References column.

 

Page 145 line 1923: period spacing issue[fixed]

 

Page 145 line 1924: the word Vendors is upcased...and why is ONLY a vendor
extension point?

In theory it could be extended later by the PWG as well. [case fixed - but
?]

 

Page 149 line 1947: word spacing issues on the line. All text should be Left
justified not

simply justified. [bad spacing is x-problem -  document normal text is fully
justified- would prefer not to change]

 

page 161 line 2008: Specific example of table with no description and no
references. [fixed]

 

Page 167 line 2153: word spacing issues. [X-problem]

 

Page 170: Blank page needs to be removed, and previously mentioned duplicate
figure. [X-problem]

 

Page 172 line 2190: missing period [fixed]

 

Page 176 line 2262: merged un-ordered list items (Processing - ) is the
start of a new list item [fixed]

 

Page 178 line 2311: Text in figure overlaps the figure content (CancelJob)[?
Do not see this]

 

Page 180 line 2354: Double periods mid-line. [fixed]

 

Page 186 line 2564: NEED NOT is NOT a compliance term... [fixed].

 

Page 195 line 2920: NEED NOT is NOT a compliance term... (also occurs on
line 2944,3013) [fixed]

 

Page 199 line 3048: need reference for Counter spec. [fixed]

 

Page 200 line 3110 and 3122: need periods at the end of the sentences[fixed]

 

Page 203 line 3131 second and third to last rows of table: missing
references and the "H"

should not be up-cased in MadiaUsedSheets. (also no reference column for
this table) [fixed]

 

Page 204 line 3142: Confusing reference to the Counter Spec. Is it 5106.1 or
5106.10?? [fixed]

 

Page 205 line 3152: Same Counter Spec. reference issue as previous comment.
[fixed]

 

Page 206 line 3182 and 3185: Need a TM after 2600 in both citations of IEEE
Std. 2600TM-2008. [fixed]

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20110223/a12f5b00/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list