[MFD] Question on CoverType element

[MFD] Question on CoverType element

[MFD] Question on CoverType element

Petrie, Glen glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com
Fri Jan 11 22:25:20 UTC 2013


Anyone,

 

As I work more on the PWG PJT I noticed that the element CoverType is
somewhat confusing as currently defined in the pjt.

 

The CoverType basically determines if a back and/or front cover should
be printed.  That ok, but the element CoverType is contain in the object
definition for a Cover; thus, the CoverType element is defined in two
places and affect the two places.  For example,  

 

 

PrintDocumentProcessing-> CoverBack -> CoverType = PrintNone

PrintDocumentProcessing-> CoverFront-> CoverType = PrintBoth

 

A conflict on what to do. 

 

Recommended fix is to either 

1.	Move CoverType to be directly PrintDocumentProcessing struct
2.	Define CoverType as boolean in CoverBack and CoverFront struct

 

What do other think?

 

Glen

 

p.s.

 

The name CoverType is not description of the element; a better element
name would be CoverRequest

 

gwp

 

p.s.

 

Yes, I know the spec if published but I think this result in long term
problem and needs to be fixed sooner rather than later.

 

gwp


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20130111/c96b5db8/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the mfd mailing list