P1394> Scope of EMAIL Poll

P1394> Scope of EMAIL Poll

Gregory A. LeClair gleclair at agentz.com
Tue Feb 24 03:32:15 EST 1998


The scope is printing. 


Feel free to elaborate if you want to answer the poll.


Regards,


Greg


-----Original Message-----
From:	Atsushi_Nakamura [SMTP:atsnaka at bsd.canon.co.jp]
Sent:	Monday, February 23, 1998 7:53 PM
To:	gleclair at agentz.com; '1394 PWG'
Subject:	P1394> Scope of EMAIL Poll






1 question concerning the scope of this poll ;






 1) What is the scope of the "interest level"? PC prinitng, Consumer 


     peer to peer printing, or both ?






Also, 


If I was in charge of this poll, I would add another question to the survey.






3) Opinions on multiple printing protocols;






 	(   )   There should be ONLY 1 printing protocol in any case and any application.


 	(   )   2 protocols are ACCEPTABLE if necessary for different situations


 	(   )   I PREFER more than 2 protocols 


 	(   )   Other (describe)__________________










At 18:35 98/02/23 -0800, Gregory A. LeClair wrote:


> During the 1394 PWG 2/23 telecon, it was suggested we undertake an non-binding email poll to 


> gauge interest in various proposals being considered by the working group.


> 


> Please forward your reply to the 1394 PWG reflector - p1394 at pwg.org


> 


> If possible, please reply by Friday, February 27th, 1998.


> 


> Thanks,


> Greg LeClair


> 


> PS> If you have suggestions for this or future polls, please send them under a different


> subject line.


> 


> ===================================================================


> 


> 1. Please rank the following proposals according to your interest level using the following scale ( 10 = High level 


> of interest vs. 0 = No interest).


> 


> 	(   )   1284.4 Over Data FIFO Architecture (DFA)


> 	(   )   1284.4 Over SBP-2


> 	(   )   Direct Printing Protocol - (current PWG-C proposal 0.71)


> 	(   )   SBP-2 Native - (current PWG proposal 0.1c)


> 	(   )   Other (describe)__________________


> 


> 2. Please provide background comments on your ranking. 


> 


> 	Why do you prefer to use the given solution?


> 


> 	Why should others consider the given solution?


> 


> 	Does the the given solution meet the existing requirements?


> 


> 	What issues are you aware of (if any) with the given solution?


> 


> 	What is your opinion on the best way to move the discussion forward?


> 


> 	Other comments?


> 


> 


> 


> 


> 


> 






-----------------------------------------


<bigger>Atsushi Nakamura


</bigger>-----------------------------------------




BJ Technology Develpoment 22,


Canon Inc.




53 Imai Kami-cho


Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki-shi


postal no. 211




tel:+81-3-44-733-6111(ext.5593)


    +81-3-44-739-6634(direct)


fax:+81-3-44-739-6756


email(1):Atsushi_Nakamura at cbj.canon.co.jp


email(2):atsnaka at bsd.canon.co.jp


-----------------------------------------



More information about the P1394 mailing list