P1394> Conference call Agenda

P1394> Conference call Agenda

Turner, Randy rturner at sharplabs.com
Thu Mar 19 13:02:21 EST 1998


Concerning the conference call...


Someone needs to give me a time that is convenient for both U.S and
Japan participants....


What did we use last time?


Randy




	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Greg LeClair [SMTP:gregoryl at spider.epson.com]
	Sent:	Wednesday, March 18, 1998 6:13 PM
	To:	'Greg Shue'; Turner, Randy
	Cc:	don at lexmark.com; p1394 at pwg.org
	Subject:	RE: P1394> Conference call Agenda


	Do we have a telecon scheduled?
	If not tomorrow(Thurs), then Friday or Monday.


	Idea for an Agenda


	Revised proposal summary 
	- Alan Berkema tells me we'll have revision up by Monday 3/23


	Feedback received 
	- How does it revise the model?
	- Is it a Unit Directory that provides a Function?
	- Is a Function is provided by one or more Services?
	- Individual Services are accessed via LUNs?
	- Glossary terms to consider adding to profile document


	Issues with revised model
	- Different LUNs represent different services
	- List of functions and required services
	- Do we know everything we need to access a function?


	Other issues?




	Regards,


	Greg LeClair










	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Greg Shue [SMTP:gregs at sdd.hp.com]
	Sent:	Wednesday, March 18, 1998 11:46 AM
	To:	Turner, Randy
	Cc:	don at lexmark.com; p1394 at pwg.org
	Subject:	Re: P1394> Conference call proposal




	I agree that we need to call it.  The time frames
	are OK for me, but 4PM EST is too early in Japan.
	(8 or 9 hrs before 1pm Pacific, i.e. 4-5 AM Japan!)


	Greg Shue


	> 
	> 
	> Uh, make that 4 PM EST. on 3/19 Is that ok?
	> 
	> Randy




	-- 
	Greg Shue
	Hewlett-Packard Company
	Office Products Division			gregs at sdd.hp.com
	----------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the P1394 mailing list