1212r981209-0001
<html>
<head>
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<meta NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Microsoft FrontPage 3.0">
<title>1212r - December 9, 1998</title>
</head>
<body LINK="#0000ff">
<b>
<p>IEEE 1212r Meeting<br>
December 9, 1998</p>
<i>
<p>Meeting Secretary</p>
</i></b><font SIZE="2">
<p>John Fuller was encouraged to be secretary for this meeting.</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Review Previous Meeting Minutes</p>
</b></i><font SIZE="2">
<p>Previous meeting minutes were adopted without objection.</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Instance Directory</p>
</b></i>
<p>Keyword proposal</p>
<font SIZE="2">
<p>Document is 98-005r0.pdf on our web site. Discussion centered on the choice of a more
limited 7-bit ASCII character set. Peter Johansson moved that we use the character set
that includes "a"-"z", "0"-"9", and "-".
Seconded by John Fuller. Motion passes 5-0-0. John Fuller moved and Atsushi Nakamura
seconded that 98-005 as modified be incorporated into section 8.</p>
</font>
<p>Feature directory interaction with dependent info directories</p>
<font SIZE="2">
<p>Document is fdirprop.pdf on our web site. Discussion centered on the differences
between feature directories and dependent info directories. It was concluded that there is
a difference in that dependent info directories get their format from the context of their
parent and as such must only be pointed to by one directory; feature directories on the
other hand specify their own format and may be pointed to by multiple parents (e.g.
instance directory and unit directory).</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Vendor (Model) directory</p>
</b></i><font SIZE="2">
<p>We discussed John Fuller’s proposal to allow Vendor and Model keys to appear in
unit directories. Consensus: These key should be allowed in unit directories, the Vendor
immediate key shall appear in the root directory even if a Vendor directory is present.
Similarly, if vendor identification is used in a unit directory then the Vendor immediate
key shall appear in the unit directory even if a Vendor directory is present. The Model
key only has the immediate form. The specified vendor administers the 24-bit number.</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Extended Keys</p>
</b></i><font SIZE="2">
<p>DavidJ will give Peter a write up of extended keys to be incorporated into section 8.</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Textual descriptor enhancement</p>
</b></i><font SIZE="2">
<p>Document is 98-004r3.pdf on our web site. Daniel described the changes made to this
document that were requested at the last meeting. John Fuller moved and Peter Johansson
seconded that the document be rolled into the section 8 document with the single change of
swapping the top two fields of Language Specifier. Passed without objections.</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Discussion on unit directory representation</p>
</b></i>
<p>How to describe devices with multi-protocol per function</p>
<font SIZE="2">
<p>We discussed the problem of a single function instance with two protocols (e.g. a
printer with SBP-2 and DPP) with both units listed in the root directory. There is no good
answer for the vendor here, either he only puts one unit in the root and loses the other
capability for legacy enumerators or he puts both units into the root and lives with the
user confusion and possible improper operation for legacy enumerators. Consensus: Devices
that use instance directories ideally will have no unit directories pointed to by the root
directory; if the vendor needs to deal legacy enumerators we recommend that a single unit
directory from each instance directory be included in the root; if this is still
insufficient then we’ve warned you, just do what you want and live with the
consequences.</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Message Request/Message Response</p>
</b></i><font SIZE="2">
<p>These packets begin with 16 bits of reserved, then 24 bits of Company-ID (cf. OUI),
then 24 bits of format identifier (assigned by owner of Company-ID), packet size should be
between 8 and 64 bytes.</p>
<p>This location only accepts block writes, quadlet writes give type-error.</p>
<p>Behavior for writes of greater than 64 bytes or misaligned writes are bus dependent.</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Modifiable ROM</p>
</b></i><font SIZE="2">
<p>It was decided that the message request/response could be used to build a private
protocol to modify ROM and hence does not need to be defined by 1212r. Changing ROM is
tricky, caveat emptor; Peter to craft some text.</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Action Items</b></i>
<ul>
<li><font SIZE="2">Peter to incorporate keyword proposal into section 8</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">Peter to poll for usage of key values.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">Peter to modify section 8 to allow vendor and model keys in unit
directories.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">DavidJ will give Peter a write up of extended keys to be incorporated
into section 8.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">DavidJ to send section ? for lock operations to Richard Churchill.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">Peter to incorporate textual descriptor proposal into section 8.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">Peter to write warning paragraph in section 8 about multi-protocol
functions and legacy enumerators.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">Peter to write up message request/response description for section 8.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">Peter to craft text for section 8 about modifiable ROM.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">Brian to request that the TA begin a registry for keywords.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">Brian to request that the TA begin a registry for configuration ROMs.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">DavidJ to propose options for reaffirming 1212 vs. writing a new
specification.</font></li>
<li><font SIZE="2">Peter to change references to "OUI" to "RAC-Id"</font></li>
</ul>
<i><b>
<p>Next Meeting – January 25-26, Maui</p>
</b></i><font SIZE="2">
<p>Web site submissions for January meeting are due directly to Greg LeClair by 1/8/99.</p>
<p>Meeting will just be one day, 1/26/99.</p>
</font><i><b>
<p>Attendance</p>
</b></i>
<table border="0">
<tr>
<td><font SIZE="2">John Nels Fuller</font></td>
<td><font SIZE="2">Micrsoft Corporation</font></td>
<td><a HREF="mailto:jfuller@microsoft.com"><font SIZE="2">jfuller@microsoft.com</font></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font SIZE="2">Peter Johansson</font></td>
<td><font SIZE="2">Congruent Software</font></td>
<td><a HREF="mailto:PJohansson@aol.com"><font SIZE="2">PJohansson@aol.com</font></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font SIZE="2">Brian Batchelder</font></td>
<td><font SIZE="2">Hewlett-Packard</font></td>
<td><a HREF="mailto:brianb@vcd.hp.com"><font SIZE="2">brianb@vcd.hp.com</font></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font SIZE="2">Daniel Meirsman</font></td>
<td><font SIZE="2">Philips Consumer Electronics</font></td>
<td><a HREF="mailto:daniel.meirsman@leu.ce.philips.com"><font SIZE="2">daniel.meirsman@leu.ce.philips.com</font></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font SIZE="2">Atsushi Nakamura</font></td>
<td><font SIZE="2">Canon</font></td>
<td><a HREF="mailto:Atsushi_Nakamura@cbj.canon.co.jp"><font SIZE="2">Atsushi_Nakamura@cbj.canon.co.jp</font></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font SIZE="2">David James</font></td>
<td><font SIZE="2">Sony</font></td>
<td><a HREF="mailto:davej@lsi.sel.sony.com"><font SIZE="2">davej@lsi.sel.sony.com</font></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font SIZE="2">Greg LeClair</font></td>
<td><font SIZE="2">Epson</font></td>
<td><a HREF="mailto:greg@erc.epson.com"><font SIZE="2">greg@erc.epson.com</font></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font SIZE="2">Hisato Shima</font></td>
<td><font SIZE="2">Sony</font></td>
<td><a HREF="mailto:shima@usrl.sony.com"><font SIZE="2">shima@usrl.sony.com</font></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><font SIZE="2">David Smith</font></td>
<td><font SIZE="2">TI</font></td>
<td><a HREF="mailto:desmith@ti.com"><font SIZE="2">desmith@ti.com</font></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>