On Mon, 10 Mar 1997, Harry Lewis <harryl at VNET.IBM.COM> wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> >Please go ahead and assume that these five bits can be added,
> >and we will have final confirmation by late April/early May.
>> However, I need some clarification on the status.
>> We've been working on moving the Printer MIB forward for more than
> a year now.
I wonder how you arrive at one year? Looking back through my notes,
I find 12/23/96 as the date I sent the email telling everyone
what we had to do to get to DRAFT standard. It looks like three
months to me.
> Tightening the definition of the "top 25" alerts ranks
> high on the list of meaningful accomplishments. We can't afford
> to proceed with the assumption that hrMIB will accept the new
> hrPrinterDetectedErrorState bits only to find out in *May* that
> this is not so.
Then prepare a back-up plan; that's the only alterantive.
> Is it just "paper work" that will have to wait until May? If we do
> proceed, as recommended is there any chance the change will be rejected
> later?
Harry -- I cannot comment on this. I am going to ask
you to have faith that all the right things are happening to
make adding the five bits a successful outcome.