[PMP] Printer MIB and IPP MFD Alerts - Stable draft WG last call

[PMP] Printer MIB and IPP MFD Alerts - Stable draft WG last call

William Wagner wamwagner at comcast.net
Mon Mar 5 19:55:13 UTC 2012


I believe that Michael's comments are the only working group last call
comments on the MFD Alerts specification. I request that Ira address these
comments, with the intent of getting WG agreement and submission for PWG
last call at this Thursday's WIMS/PMP conference call.

Thanks,

Bill Wagner 

 

From: William Wagner [mailto:wamwagner at comcast.net] 
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 1:56 PM
To: 'Michael Sweet'; 'Ira McDonald'
Cc: 'pmp at pwg.org'; 'wims at pwg.org'
Subject: RE: [WIMS] Printer MIB and IPP MFD Alerts - Stable draft (26 Feb
2012)

 

Thanks Michael,

Comments:

General agreement  except as noted:

Item 4.  "modem" , regardless of its origin, is now a distinct word in the
dictionaries

Line spacing : although the presentation in the PDF should look consistent,
it may be OK to fudge MS Word occasionally, as long as the un-line-numbered
PDF looks OK.

Item 8. Footer gets split after page 10. (need to remove one of the spaces
in the template, perhaps two if number of pages exceeds 99). That will
resolve cited whitespace problem.

Note also, it appears that template header and footer  were modified by
adding multiple LFCR, making margins wider. I don't think that is necessary.

 

Bill Wagner

 

 

From: wims-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:wims-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Sweet
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 6:22 PM
To: Ira McDonald
Cc: pmp at pwg.org; wims at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [WIMS] Printer MIB and IPP MFD Alerts - Stable draft (26 Feb
2012)

 

My comments:

 

1. Abstract: maybe spell out facsimile here instead of just using "fax", and
I suggest combining paragraph 1 and 2 since there is duplicate information
(and "This document also ..." is used a couple times in a row) - I'm a big
fan of short abstracts...

 

2. Page 4: Should add "About the Workgroup for Imaging Management Solutions"
section with the links to the PMP activity in it (just like we do for
others...)

 

3. Page 7: Most printers sold today are MFDs, so I would recommend just
dropped "in office environments".

 

4. Global: Do we care that MODEM is an acronym (MOdulator DEModulator) and
not an ordinary word?

 

5. Page 8, section 2.2:

            a. Line 214: extra blank line

            b. Lines 224-225: Wrong paragraph style, so you needed an extra
blank line?

 

6. Page 9, section 3.1:

            a. Line 232: Missing space - list style issue? (should be 12pt
before, suppress between paragraphs of same style), see page 11, section 3.4
which has a different style...

 

7. Page 14, Section 4.2, Line 337: "Fax Modem" has a space, but none of the
other subunits do. Typo?

 

8. Global: Check that your footer text has a space before the "Page N of M"
line; Page 16 has no whitespace between the table and footer...

 

9. Page 22, Section 8, Line 452: New paragraph?

 

10. Page 26, Section 9.3: Wrong format for registrations; see existing
5100.x specs for the format...

 

11. Page 30, Section 11: "Michael Sweet" instead of "Mike Sweet"

 

That's all!

 

 

 

 

On Feb 26, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Ira McDonald wrote:

 

Hi folks,

[For WIMS WG last call]


I just posted a Stable draft of the Printer MIB and IPP MFD Alerts 
(MFD Alerts) specification at:

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/pmp/wd/wd-pmpmfdalerts10-20120226.pdf / doc
- clean copy with line numbers and live table of contents

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/pmp/wd/wd-pmpmfdalerts10-20120226-rev.pdf / doc
- redlines copy with line numbers and live table of contents

Note 1:  This version is technically complete, the IPP binding has been 
prototyped by Apple, and this document is ready for WG last call.

Note 2:  There is still a trailing blank line at the end of section 6.4, but
this is
an artifact of the PDF creation (it doesn't show in the MS Word source).

Comments?

Cheers,
- Ira

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

Change History for version of 26 February 2012 - Stable


Status:  Changed status to Stable based on Apple reported prototype 
of IPP binding, per WIMS WG review.

Editorial:  Revised section 3.3 Out-of-Scope to change "must not" to 
"should not", since section 3 Requirements is Informative.

Editorial:  Revised headers of Table 2 in section 5.2 and Table 3 in 
section 5.3 to delete redundant word "Value" and thus correct widowed 
line at bottom of Table 2 (see clean version), per WIMS WG review.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
wims mailing list
wims at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/wims

 

________________________________________________________________________

Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/pmp/attachments/20120305/d02bcfcf/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the pmp mailing list