Still need Last Call responses. Please?
From: William Wagner
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 9:22 PM
To: pwg-announce at pwg.org, ipp, cloud
Greetings: It appears that the IPP INFRA spec has met PWG Last Call quorum requirements. After resolution of comments, this would allow that spec to go to PWG vote. However, since INFRA and CLOUD are mutually dependent, one cannot be approved separately from the other. The CLOUD spec is far short of satisfying PWG Last Call quorum requirements. I urge members, particularly those who have responded to the IPP INFRA Last Call, to take a look at the CLOUD spec and respond to the Cloud Model Last Call as indicated below.
Thanks, Bill Wagner
From: William Wagner
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:01 AM
To: pwg-announce at pwg.org
The PWG Last Call of the Cloud Imaging Requirements and Model (CLOUDIMAGING)
specification located at:
is extended to 8 March to allow for sufficient acknowledgements to meet the PWG
Process quorum requirement.
Apple has provided notice that it has prototyped the required attributes and
values defined in the IPP Shared Infrastructure Extensions document, which
is an IPP Binding of this Cloud Imaging Requirements and Model
specification; the prototype of a model binding satisfies the prototype
requirement for the specification of a general model. The Cloud WG has
completed extensive review of the various revisions of this model document
and a workgroup last call.
Note that because the Cloud Imaging Requirements and Model and the IPP
Shared Infrastructure Extensions specifications are mutually dependent, they
must both be approved in voting before either becomes a PWG Candidate Standard.
And specifications must meet PWG Last Call quorum before they can be put to vote.
The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG members must
acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any document
can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote
but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.
HOW TO RESPOND
Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the Cloud Imaging Requirements and
Model specification and has [no] comments
WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE
Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses
(replacing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):
cloud "at" pwg "dot" org (Cloud WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!);
rnevo "at" sea "dot" Samsung "dot" com; (Ron Nevo, Cloud WG Chair);
wamwagner "at" comcast "dot" net (Bill Wagner, Cloud Vice chair); msweet
"at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, Cloud Secretary)
Note that you must be subscribed to the Cloud WG mailing list to send email
to that list - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. You can
subscribe to this list at https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud.
Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.
Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 is
William A Wagner, Cloud Vice Chair
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...