(no subject)

(no subject)

(no subject)

Harry Lewis harryl at vnet.ibm.com
Sat Aug 31 15:52:42 EDT 1996


Jay, I agree.

As secretary, I believe I reflected the discussion fairly accurately,
but I think your recommendations are actually what we meant. I would
like to have the record stand that, for the SanDiego "port number"
discussion, we should replace UNIX TCP/IP with LPR/LPD.

>In the "Channels Group" section of the minutes:
>  "For UNIX TCP/IP it would be a port number.  For other protocols it
>   might be something else."
>I believe the phrase "LPD/LPR" should replace "UNIX TCP/IP" here.


More information about the Pwg mailing list