(no subject)

(no subject)

(no subject)

Harry Lewis harryl at vnet.ibm.com
Sat Aug 31 15:52:42 EDT 1996


Subject:LPR/LPD


Jay, I agree.


As secretary, I believe I reflected the discussion fairly accurately,
but I think your recommendations are actually what we meant. I would
like to have the record stand that, for the SanDiego "port number"
discussion, we should replace UNIX TCP/IP with LPR/LPD.




>In the "Channels Group" section of the minutes:
>
>  "For UNIX TCP/IP it would be a port number.  For other protocols it
>   might be something else."
>
>I believe the phrase "LPD/LPR" should replace "UNIX TCP/IP" here.


Harry



More information about the Pwg mailing list