PWG> Process

PWG> Process

PWG> Process

Dennis Carney dcarney at
Thu May 29 12:53:17 EDT 2003


My comments below, marked with <dmc></dmc>.


                      ElliottBradshaw at o                                                                                                            
                           To:       pwg at                                                                               
                      Sent by:                 cc:                                                                                                 
                      owner-pwg at        Subject:  Re: PWG> Process                                                                          
                      05/29/03 06:48 AM                                                                                                            

Since I'm about to post documents for CR, I went through the file naming
7section in detail.

1.  For a Working Draft (e.g.), the name is of the form:

But if a Working Group publishes multiple projects, shouldn't "wg10" be
replaced by something project specific?  And does the local file name have
to include the group name somewhere (for global uniqueness) or will that be
handled by the PWG standard number assigned later?

So, if the CR group publishes a working draft called "The
RepertoireSupported Element" what should I call it:
You're right that we haven't dealt with "subprojects".
I'd vote for the third option just above, or a slightly-different fourth

2.  Can we use the http: URL rather than ftp: in references to these
documents?  Seems friendlier.
I'm not sure what you mean.

Elliott Bradshaw
Director, Software Engineering
Oak Technology Imaging Group
781 638-7534

More information about the Pwg mailing list