OK, thanks for the comments. I am keeping a list. I have no strong objection to eliminating this largely historical definition although I see no harm in defining WIMS Managed Device (since most people will be thinking in terms of device) to differentiate it from Managed Entity (which is what we are dealing with). Hopefully, your critical reviews will extend to the section 6, which has been modified so many times that I am sure that there are some serious problems there.
Bill Wagner
-----Original Message-----
From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald at sharplabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:53 AM
To: 'Harry Lewis'; wims at pwg.org
Subject: RE: WIMS> Draft comment
Hi,
Yes and define WIMS Managed Service and Legacy Managed Service.
I suggest NOT doing any of these terms.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org]On Behalf Of Harry Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 11:11 AM
To: wims at pwg.org
Subject: WIMS> Draft comment
Comment.
In draft <ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/wd/wd-wims10-20040810.pdf> wd-wims10-20040810
Under Terminology (2)
I don't think we need the definition of WIMS Managed Device. It appears redundant with WIMS Managed Entity and is only used in the document in the description or WIMS Imaging System (later in the Terminology section). Also, if we are to prescribe the term WIMS Managed Device then we should likewise include Legacy Managed Device.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM STSM
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
http://www.pwg.org
IBM Printing Systems
http://www.ibm.com/printers
303-924-5337
----------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.pwg.org/archives/wims/attachments/20040812/dc2c5d7d/attachment-0001.html