WIMS> [New WIMS Protocol draft posted]

WIMS> [New WIMS Protocol draft posted]

WIMS> [New WIMS Protocol draft posted]

McDonald, Ira imcdonald at sharplabs.com
Tue Aug 30 21:40:52 EDT 2005


Hi,

Retitled to advertise the new WIMS Protocol draft:

  ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/wd/wd-wims10-20050830.pdf

Cheers,
- Ira


Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald at sharplabs.com 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wims at pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims at pwg.org]On Behalf Of
wamwagner at comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 7:56 PM
To: 'wims at pwg.org'
Subject: WIMS> No WIMS Teleconference Wednesday 31 August


Sorry I did not get out the minutes from last week's WIMS Protocol
Teleconference.  (I left my notes in Massachusetts) Main points were:

1. There were no objections to Ira's Requirements section
2. There were objections to the way the figures translate to PDF. Jerry
offered to reformat them.
3. In transforming Ira's requirements section to MS Word, I had made some
global changes that inadventently when into the draft as a whole.These made
reading a bit difficult. Since no one else commented on these rather gross
anomalies, it is safe to assume no one read the draft.
4. Ira had a set of additional changes he felt were necessary, including a
new chapter 5.
5. The potential changes to the document made review prior to the changes of
questionable value. 
6. With Rick not in attendance, discussion of extensions to support
manager-initiated management did not seem appropriate.

With these considerations, we decided to skip the  Wednesday 31 August
meeting.

I have posted the updated spec with the global error corrected, Jerry's
revised pictures, and Ira's "to do list"  at
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/wd/wd-wims10-20050830.pdf.

Although Ira's requirements section and proposed changes make the spec a
more rigorously valid document, they also abstract the protocol, it's
purposes and the way it is intended to work to such an extent that I wonder
whether anyone will invest the energy needed to understand it. I would
propose that, if indeed there is any interest in the idea, a non rigorous,
semi-technical, document on the order of the Scenarios be considered.

Bill Wagner

Chairman, WIMS



More information about the Wims mailing list