ACTION - All - Read and comment on this power states issue for EMAN.
The latest draft of the IETF EMAN Energy Monitoring MIB (monitor-only
subset of EMAN model) includes the following issue:
"OPEN ISSUE 12: Consideration of IEEE-ISTO PWG in the IANA list
of Power State Set ? PWG Imaging Systems Power Management MIB
And Bruce Nordman (EMAN co-chair) raised the question of registering the
PWG power states with IANA for EMAN last week at the PWG meeting
- I waffled in my reply.
On reflection, I propose that the PWG does NOT register their own power
states (adding significant complexity to the NMS systems that will already
support the other three standard power state sets).
Instead, best practice would be for PWG Power MIB enabled devices to
*fold* vendor extension states into their base DMTF power states (already
in EMAN) for more coherent power monitoring and power management
across the enterprise. This folding would have to occur anyway for a DMTF
CIM mapping of the PWG Power Model, so we'd be consistent for "outside"
PS - I'd like to reply on the IETF EMAN mailing list within the next two
on this issue - please send your opinions.
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SWG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Christmas through April:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
May to Christmas:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...