attachment

<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"> <style>  </style>  </head> <body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple> <div class=Section1> I intend no WIMS conference call for Monday, April 6.  I think we should have one on April 13 to consider the Face-to-Face at the end of April. More on that later in the week.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> In case you haven’t done so, please don’t forget to voice your opinion relative to Imaging Power Management at<o:p></o:p>  <tt><a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=0JjdjWfqkBq0vwvxgiChRg_3d_3d">http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=0JjdjWfqkBq0vwvxgiChRg_3d_3d</a>.<o:p></o:p></tt> <tt><o:p> </o:p></tt> <tt>Thanks,<o:p></o:p></tt> <tt><o:p> </o:p></tt> <tt>Bill Wagner</tt><o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'> From: William Wagner [mailto:wamwagner@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 1:23 PM To: wims@pwg.org Subject: 23 March, 11AM EDT ConCall <o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> There will be a WIMS telecom on  Monday, 23 March at 11 AM EDT. <o:p></o:p>  Sorry about the late notice<o:p></o:p>  Agenda: <o:p></o:p> 1. Meeting is held in accord with PWG IP Policy <o:p></o:p> 2. Identify Minute-taker <o:p></o:p>  3. Accept Minutes of 9 March<o:p></o:p> <a href="ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/minutes/cim_090309.pdf">ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/minutes/cim_090309.pdf</a><o:p></o:p>  (Thanks Craig) <o:p></o:p> 4. Project Update - Proxy Provider <o:p></o:p> Rick appears to be almost done,  but has come across some interesting problems with some of the elements he has prototypes. Review of more problems and solutions he and Ira propose.<o:p></o:p> <![if !supportLists]>a.     <![endif]>CIM_Printer.CharSetsSupported does not say whether the array should contain only unique values or all values in parallel with the NaturalLanguagesSupported array<o:p></o:p> <![if !supportLists]>b.    <![endif]>The enum list of property CIM_Printer.LanguagesSupported does not quite match that of prtInterpreterLangFamily<o:p></o:p> <![if !supportLists]>c.     <![endif]>Others?<o:p></o:p>  5. Project Update CIM_PrintServiceSettings: <o:p></o:p> <a href="ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/cim/mofinput/ira-20090216.zip">ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/cim/mofinput/ira-20090216.zip</a>  (anything new?)<o:p></o:p> 6. Talking Point:  Recent discussions on the Linked-in MPS group have suggested that managing imaging services seems  increasingly to be becoming an IT department responsibility. Whether or not we proceed with the Imaging Power Management project, this may affect the way we address Imaging System Management.<o:p></o:p>             a.  Ira identified <a href="http://www.thegreengrid.org/">http://www.thegreengrid.org/</a> as a DMTF affiliated organization concerned with Power Management.  Aside from the fact that this appears to be one more of these “private” organizations with relatively high membership fees and very restrictive access to what they are doing (but a relatively large membership), their mission seems to center on Data Center issues. Would imaging power management be a Data Center issue, or more broadly an IT  department issue, or someone else’s?<o:p></o:p>             b. From IETF and DMTF/CIM documents generated by capable but non-printer oriented people (perhaps representative of IT departments), it is apparent that they do not understand  and probably don’t care about the characteristics or capabilities of modern imaging devices. If these are the people that will manage the devices, should we be dumbing down (simplifying) the management structures?<o:p></o:p> Thanks,   <o:p></o:p> Bill Wagner <o:p></o:p>   <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> </div> </body> </html>