IFX Mail Archive: RE: Charter Bashing II

RE: Charter Bashing II

Geoff (geoffm@transwire.net)
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:24:58 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Geoff: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Re: Questions to be addressed..."

How crucial is this idea of "non-alterable"? Should this even be an =
issue,
let alone a charter constraint?

Be difficult to make anything 'non-alterable', but presumably you mean a =
system for verifying if it has been altered in transit. If the latter, =
it's an essential objective.

Geoff

Next message: Geoff: "(no subject)"
Previous message: Graham Klyne: "Re: Questions to be addressed..."