IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> What is it we really need?

Re: IPP> What is it we really need?

rdebry@us.ibm.com
Mon, 6 Jan 1997 08:17:58 -0500

Classification:
Prologue:
Epilogue:

---------------------- Forwarded by Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM on 01/06/97 06:10
AM ---------------------------

ipp-owner @ pwg.org
01/05/97 01:41 PM

Keith Moore wrote:

>p.s. Several people have expressed interest in an "http-lite" protocol,
>that is, a generic http-like, text-over-tcp, request-response protocol
>which isn't adapted for any one particular application, but can
>take adavntage of standard url types, security mechanisms, etc.

Keith, I definately think that the notion of an http-lite is worth pursuing.
It has the value of providing
a lot of common underlying services for many applications -- which is, I think,
the value we see
in basing IPP on http. The question is, how do we proceed?