---------------------- Forwarded by Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM on 01/20/97 06:02
AM ---------------------------
robert.herriot @ Eng.Sun.COM
01/17/97 09:03 PM
To: rturner @ sharplabs.com@internet, Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM
cc: ipp @ pwg.org@internet
Subject: Re: IPP> IPP Requirements Scenarios
on January 17th Bob Herriot Wrote:
>With regard to the conversation below, I have assumed that "more than
>one request" refers to sending more than one document in a print
>request. I did not think that it referred to sending multiple operations
>in a transmission. Though perhaps, this concept slid in when we
>discussed having a "getAttributes" operation accompanying a "printJob"
>operation in order to specify attributes to be in the result. I think that
>we should not allow a transaction to have multiple operations.
Bob, the operation I was trying to illustrate in the sceanrio is exactly the
getAttributes operation accompanying a PrintJob operation, which I thought
we had agreed upon. Are you now saying we should not do this???