> From rdebry@us.ibm.com Thu Feb 27 07:50:58 1997
> From: rdebry@us.ibm.com
> To: <sun.com@lms02.us1.ibm.com>, <"robert.herriot@ENG"@??.ibm.com>,
> <ipp@pwg.org>
> Subject: Re: IPP>MOD - Updated Diagram
> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1997 10:48:59 -0500
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Sender: ipp-owner@pwg.org
> X-Lines: 37
>
> Classification:
> Prologue:
> Epilogue: Roger K deBry
> Senior Techncial Staff Member
> Architecture and Technology
> IBM Printing Systems
> email: rdebry@us.ibm.com
> phone: 1-303-924-4080
>
> Bob, because of the number of windows clients and the desktop appIications that
> run on windows clients, I believe that the Windows case is too important to
> simplify
> as you've suggested. However the diagram could possibly show spooler and
> device driver as optional components.
>
> Any one else have strong feelings on this?
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM on 02/27/97 08:42
> AM ---------------------------
>
> ipp-owner @ pwg.org
> 02/26/97 07:07 PM
>
>
> To: Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM, ipp @ pwg.org@internet
> cc:
> Subject: Re: IPP>MOD - Updated Diagram
>
> Although your picture now reflects Windows applications more
> accurately, it is now too Windows specific. If the spooler and driver
> box were eliminated, then this diagram would indicate that a client
> application interacts with the ipp client (library). For Windows the
> application consists of a spooler, driver and print provider, but that
> is probably more detail than our document needs.
>
> Also, the browser is just a special application, though it may be
> important enough to show separately.
>
>